Weld-Hardened Hammermill Hammer Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hammermill hammers face issues with premature wear, catastrophic failure, and complex installation/removal due to multiple parts and gaps, leading to reduced operational efficiency and increased maintenance costs. Additionally, there is a need to optimize strength, capacity, run time, and force delivery while minimizing the number of parts and improving durability and safety.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a non-forged hammer with a saddle or hammer mouth for securement, featuring a weld-hardened edge and a non-planar body with recessed and protruding surfaces, and a MIG welding process for embedding tungsten carbide, which enhances durability and force delivery while simplifying installation and reducing wear. The hammer assembly includes multiple hammer bodies that can be easily secured and replaced, reducing lateral movement and wear on the hammermill rod.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple separate hammers with spacers are used, then the hammermill can process materials effectively, but the number of parts increases and gaps are exposed to debris creating excessive wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing capabilityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate hammers into a single integrated hammer assembly where the hammers are rigidly secured together as one unit. This eliminates the need for multiple spacers and reduces the number of gaps between hammers, thereby reducing wear from debris while maintaining the material processing capability of multiple hammers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If multiple separate hammers with spacers are used, then the hammermill can process materials effectively, but installation and removal become difficult due to flying debris damaging parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing capabilityVSAvoidinstallation and removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple hammers into a single rigid assembly, the patent reduces the number of separate parts that need to be installed and removed individually. The integrated design minimizes gaps and reduces the complexity of assembly operations, making installation and removal easier while maintaining effective material processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Force

If hammers are made heavier to increase force delivery, then more force is delivered to material, but the capacity of the hammermill decreases due to horsepower limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce delivery to materialVSAvoidhammermill capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by welding a hardened edge layer onto the contact surface of the hammer. This localized hardening provides the necessary force delivery capability without requiring the entire hammer to be heavier. The hardened edge maintains effective force delivery to material while preserving the hammermill's capacity by avoiding excessive overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If welding material is added to the hammer blade to improve comminution properties, then the hammer edge becomes more resistant to abrasion, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge wear resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by welding a hardened edge layer onto the hammer body. This composite structure combines the base hammer material with a wear-resistant hardened layer, providing superior edge wear resistance. The welding process, while adding some manufacturing complexity, is a standard industrial process that balances performance improvement with manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves the durability and operational runtime of hammermill hammers, enhances force delivery, and simplifies installation and maintenance, leading to increased efficiency and reduced maintenance costs while maintaining the benefits of free-swinging hammer design.

Implementation Method 1

A MIG welding process for embedding carbide onto a hammermill hammer is provided

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Implementation Method 2

These methods typically infuse the hammer edge, through welding, with a metallic material resistant to abrasion or wear such as tungsten carbide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion resistance: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS12138630B2Hammermill hammer
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 CPM ACQUISITION CORP
  • US12138630B2 patent drawing
  • US12138630B2 patent drawing
  • US12138630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for manufacturing improved free-swinging hammermill hammer configurations are disclosed and described and include hammers of a lightweight and efficient design. The improved hammers can be arranged in clusters. The free-swinging hammermill hammer configurations are for comminution of materials such as grain and refuse. The hammer configurations of the present disclosure are adaptable to most hammer mill or grinders having free-swinging systems. The improved configurations improve installing, removing, and cleaning hammer components within the hammermill. Additionally, the hammer configurations of the present disclosure improve the overall efficiency of the hammermill during operation.