Weld Quality Prediction Using In-Process Sensor Analytics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for determining weld quality involve destructive testing, which is costly and results in significant financial losses due to the destruction of parts, especially in high-volume production environments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using machine learning and data analytics to predict weld quality by processing weld parameter data from various sensors during the welding process, allowing for real-time evaluation and potential elimination of destructive testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If destructive testing is used to determine weld quality, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of substance worsens due to destruction of tested parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld quality assessment accuracyVSAvoiddestruction of tested parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical destructive testing systems with an optical/electrical sensing and machine learning system. Sensors capture weld parameter data (electrical, mechanical, thermal) during the welding process, and machine learning models analyze this data to predict weld quality without physically destroying the test pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensors and machine learning algorithms as intermediaries between the welding process and quality assessment. These intermediaries capture and analyze weld parameter data to predict weld quality, eliminating the need for direct destructive testing of the welded joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If destructive testing is performed on all welded pieces, then reliability is improved, but productivity worsens due to loss of production parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld quality assuranceVSAvoidproduction output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical destructive testing with a virtual assessment system using sensors and machine learning. This substitution allows real-time quality prediction without removing parts from production, maintaining both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs quality assessment during or immediately after the welding process by analyzing weld parameter data captured in real-time. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent destructive testing of production parts, as quality is determined before parts leave the production line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If sample rate is increased to improve weld quality assessment, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time worsens due to more destructive tests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld quality evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtime for destructive testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous quality monitoring by capturing and analyzing weld parameter data for every weld in real-time during production. This continuous assessment replaces periodic destructive testing, providing precise quality evaluation for all parts without interrupting production flow or consuming additional time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20220324060A1Using Analytics And Algorithms To Predict Weld Quality
Publication Date: 2022.10.13 BRANSON ULTRASONICS CORP
  • US20220324060A1 patent drawing
  • US20220324060A1 patent drawing
  • US20220324060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and methods for using analytics and algorithms to predict weld quality are provided and include a computer having a processor and memory configured to receive weld parameter data generated during a welding process by a welder to join at least two parts with a weld, input the received weld parameter data to a data analytics model to generate at least one predicted weld quality parameter, compare the predicted weld quality parameter with a weld quality parameter threshold, and generate output indicating at least one of: the at least one predicted weld quality parameter and a result of the comparison between the at least one predicted weld quality parameter and the weld quality parameter threshold