Welder Triggering Events Using Real-Time Clock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional welding systems face challenges in controlling, maintaining, and servicing multiple, isolated locations in large manufacturing environments, leading to increased costs, production delays, and reduced product quality due to the need for manual intervention and operator presence across vast distances.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that uses triggering events to automate control actions in remotely located welding devices, such as power-up and power-down protocols, shift reporting, and email notifications, based on predefined temporal occurrences or events, allowing for remote management and minimizing operator time and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual control and monitoring of welding devices are used across multiple locations, then operators can directly manage and maintain the equipment, but the cost and time required for traveling to and from remote locations increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment management reliabilityVSAvoidoperator travel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The welding device is equipped with automated self-monitoring and self-reporting capabilities. The device automatically detects its own operational status, generates maintenance alerts, and transmits data without requiring operator presence, enabling the equipment to serve its own monitoring and reporting needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A communication interface and data transmission system act as intermediaries between the remote welding device and the operator. This intermediary automatically collects device status, transmits it via communication networks, and delivers it to remote operators, eliminating the need for direct physical presence while maintaining reliable equipment management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of repair

If operators are required to physically visit remote welding locations for maintenance and monitoring, then immediate attention can be provided to equipment issues, but the frequency and cost of travel to dispersed locations becomes prohibitively expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment maintenance accessibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor welding device parameters, compare them against acceptable ranges, and automatically generate maintenance alerts when deviations are detected. This feedback mechanism enables proactive maintenance scheduling without requiring continuous operator presence or complex manual inspection procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical inspection and monitoring procedures are replaced with electronic sensors, automated data collection systems, and digital communication networks. This substitution eliminates the need for operators to physically travel to remote locations while maintaining comprehensive equipment oversight and maintenance capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If welding devices operate without automated temporal control, then operators have flexibility to manage equipment based on immediate needs, but energy consumption increases and equipment may operate during inappropriate times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures temporal control parameters, schedules, and operational windows before equipment operation begins. These preliminary settings automatically govern device operation during specified time periods, enabling energy-saving shutdowns during non-operational hours while preserving operator flexibility to override or adjust schedules as needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The welding device implements periodic operational cycles with automated start and stop functions based on predetermined time schedules. The device automatically activates during designated operational periods and shuts down during non-operational periods, creating a rhythmic pattern of operation that reduces energy consumption while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable schedule adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS7687741B2Triggering events in a welder with a real-time clock
Publication Date: 2010.03.30 LINCOLN GLOBAL INC
  • US7687741B2 patent drawing
  • US7687741B2 patent drawing
  • US7687741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed that facilitate inducing one or more actions, such as generation of a shift report data related to construction device(s), via detection of specified triggering events. The system comprises a triggering component that determines whether a triggering event has occurred a control component that initiates an action in response to the triggering event. Triggering events can comprise specific times of day as determined by a real-time clock that can be associated with a construction/fabrication device, such as a welder. Additionally, actions responsive to triggering events can be tagged for human approval prior to initiation in order to provide system flexibility.