Welding Arc Termination Control via Dynamic Power Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current welding systems face challenges in achieving smooth arc termination due to operator-dependent actuation of extraneous switches or presetting arc threshold values, leading to unsatisfactory weld discontinuities and inefficiencies, especially in dynamic environments where novice operators may struggle to set appropriate thresholds.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that automatically monitors arc parameters to set a dynamic threshold for controlled arc termination, reducing weld power gradually while maintaining shielding gas flow, using a controller connected to the power source to execute the termination procedure based on feedback signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If operator releases the torch trigger to terminate the welding process, then the arc termination is expedient and quick, but the weld quality deteriorates due to unsatisfactory weld discontinuity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc termination speedVSAvoidweld quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the arc termination process by automatically reducing weld power in stages while maintaining shielding gas flow, transforming the static trigger-release termination into a dynamic controlled process that adapts to welding conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller monitors welding parameters and provides feedback control during arc termination, automatically adjusting power reduction based on monitored arc characteristics to ensure optimal weld quality throughout the termination sequence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If a separate switch or foot pedal is provided for arc termination control, then the arc termination quality improves through gradual power reduction, but the device complexity increases and operator ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld termination qualityVSAvoidoperator ease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the arc termination control function with the existing torch trigger mechanism, combining the simple one-handed trigger operation with automated power reduction control that would otherwise require separate switches or pedals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller automatically executes the power reduction sequence without requiring operator intervention, making the system self-serving by monitoring welding parameters and autonomously controlling the termination process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If preset arc threshold values are used to automate termination, then operator intervention is reduced, but the device complexity increases and adaptability to varying welding conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetermination automationVSAvoidadaptability to welding conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines arc termination timing based on real-time monitoring of welding parameters and arc characteristics, eliminating the need for static preset thresholds and adapting automatically to varying welding conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors welding parameters and uses feedback control to determine the optimal termination moment, replacing preset threshold automation with adaptive feedback-based automation that responds to actual welding conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures consistent and efficient weld termination with improved quality by dynamically responding to varying welding conditions, reducing operator intervention and minimizing the need for frequent threshold adjustments, thus enhancing process efficiency and weld quality.

Implementation Method 1

a welding arc is generated between a torch and a workpiece by a power source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Arc: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

controls a reduction in weld current to terminate the weld arc

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Arc: Electric Arc

Data Source

PatentUS7642486B2Welding device with arc termination control
Publication Date: 2010.01.05 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US7642486B2 patent drawing
  • US7642486B2 patent drawing
  • US7642486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A welding-type apparatus and method providing controlled termination of a welding-type process includes monitoring an arc parameter and setting a threshold based on the monitored arc parameter. When the arc parameter achieves the threshold, weld power is gradually reduced until arc termination. The system provides for a controlled arc termination process which is dynamically defined by the characteristics of each welding arc.