Welding Control Prioritization by Fault Cost Impact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional welding control systems fail to account for the complex structure of manufactured assemblies, leading to inefficient optimization of welding processes, where non-significant operations are prioritized over those with significant impacts on total fault costs.

Innovation Solution

A welding control system that monitors and calculates welding error rates and fault costs for each mechanical entity type, identifying and optimizing significant welding operations to reduce manufacturing fault costs by determining error rates, calculating faulty entities, and weighting them with manufacturing effort values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional welding control systems optimize welding processes without considering assembly structure and fault cost impact, then welding operations can be performed with standard monitoring, but optimization efforts are misplaced on non-significant operations while significant operations remain unimproved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality consistencyVSAvoidoptimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different optimization strategies to different welding operations based on their specific impact on fault costs. By calculating and weighting the fault cost impact of each welding operation individually, the system identifies which specific welding locations require attention, rather than applying uniform optimization across all operations. This localized approach ensures optimization resources are concentrated on critical welding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop that continuously monitors welding operations, calculates fault cost impacts, and uses this information to guide optimization efforts. The determination unit calculates welding error rates, the calculation unit computes fault cost impacts, and this feedback information directs subsequent optimization actions to the most significant welding operations, creating a closed-loop control system for continuous improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If welding control systems monitor all welding operations uniformly, then comprehensive data is collected, but significant welding operations with high fault cost impact cannot be identified and prioritized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding operation monitoringVSAvoidfault cost impact information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary calculation layer that processes raw welding data and transforms it into meaningful fault cost impact information. The determination unit serves as an intermediary that calculates welding error rates from raw data, and the calculation unit acts as another intermediary that converts these error rates into fault cost impacts weighted by manufacturing effort values. This intermediary processing chain extracts and highlights the critical information about which welding operations have the most significant impact on overall assembly reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If optimization resources are distributed evenly across all welding operations, then all operations receive equal attention, but resources are wasted on low-impact operations while high-impact operations are under-optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding process optimizationVSAvoidoptimization resource allocation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial optimization action by concentrating optimization resources on only those welding operations that have significant impact on fault costs. Rather than attempting to optimize all welding operations equally, the system identifies and focuses on the critical subset of operations where optimization will yield the greatest return. This selective approach avoids wasting resources on low-impact operations while ensuring adequate optimization of high-impact operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11137748B2Welding control system
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 FRONIUS INT GMBH
  • US11137748B2 patent drawing
  • US11137748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A welding control system is provided for monitoring welding operations of a plurality of welding units within a production facility configured to provide weld data associated with the respective mechanical entities, including a determination unit configured to determine for each type of mechanical entity a corresponding welding error rate on the basis of weld data received from welding units of the production facility, a calculation unit configured to calculate for each type of mechanical entity the number of faulty mechanical entities of the respective entity type depending on the number of mechanical entities used and configured to weight the calculated number of faulty mechanical entities of the respective entity type with a predetermined manufacturing effort value.