Resistance Welding Parameter Adaptation for Spatter Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resistance welding processes often result in suboptimal quality due to inadequate adaptation of welding parameters, leading to welding spatter and contamination, which requires manual intervention and slows down production.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses statistical analysis of welding characteristic values to dynamically and automatically adapt welding parameters, such as electrode force and current, to prevent spatter by adjusting parameters based on spatter occurrence rates and distribution patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If welding parameters are kept fixed according to prescribed welding programs, then production efficiency is maintained through automated welding processes, but welding quality deteriorates due to inadequate adaptation leading to spatter and contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidwelding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of welding parameters by continuously monitoring characteristic values (such as welding current, voltage, and resistance) and automatically adjusting parameters based on real-time statistical analysis. This transforms the static welding process into a dynamic one that adapts to varying conditions, resolving the contradiction between maintaining fixed efficient production and achieving adaptive quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where characteristic values from welding processes are continuously measured, statistically analyzed, and used to automatically adapt welding parameters. This closed-loop control ensures that welding quality is maintained through real-time parameter adjustment while preserving production efficiency through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If welding parameters are manually adapted to improve welding quality, then spatter and contamination are reduced, but production efficiency decreases due to manual intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by implementing automated statistical analysis and parameter adaptation without human intervention. The welding control unit automatically processes characteristic values, performs statistical evaluations, and adjusts welding parameters based on pre-defined criteria, allowing the system to optimize its own performance while maintaining high production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment of welding parameters with an automated electronic control system. The mechanical process of manual parameter change is substituted by electronic signal processing and automated control algorithms, eliminating the need for human intervention while maintaining or improving welding quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If statistical analysis is performed continuously after each welding process to optimize parameters, then welding quality is maximized, but processing time increases due to constant analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic statistical analysis at predetermined intervals or after a specified number of welding processes rather than after every single process. This periodic approach maintains welding quality through regular parameter optimization while minimizing processing time losses by avoiding continuous analysis after each individual welding operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing statistical analysis only when predetermined criteria are met or when quality deviations are detected, rather than continuously analyzing every welding process. This selective approach optimizes welding quality at critical moments while reducing unnecessary processing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures continuous optimization of welding parameters, reducing spatter occurrence and maintaining high welding quality without manual intervention, thereby enhancing production efficiency and reducing Q stops.

Implementation Method 1

the welding electrodes are energized with a welding current for the duration of a welding time, as a result of which resistance heating of the two workpieces to be welded takes place between the welding electrodes, and the workpieces are heated until reaching a required welding temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistance heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12109642B2Method for resistance welding
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12109642B2 patent drawing
  • US12109642B2 patent drawing
  • US12109642B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for resistance welding includes performing a plurality of resistance welding processes during which welding electrodes are pressed against respective welding spots of respective workpieces. The welding electrodes are energized with a respective welding current for each of the plurality of resistance welding processes, and for each of the plurality of resistance welding processes, a respective at least one characteristic value that characterizes a quality of the welding is determined. A statistical analysis of the determined at least one characteristic value for each of the plurality of resistance welding processes is performed, and based upon the analysis, an adaptation of the prescribed welding parameters is determined.