Welding Procedure Naming via Remote Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern welding systems face challenges in upgrading, maintaining, and controlling various welding locations due to their complexity and distribution across large environments, with existing systems lacking comprehensive identification and designation of welding procedures, leading to difficulties in operator understanding and management.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that allows users to assign arbitrary names to welding modes and procedures through an external interactive configuration tool or user interface, enabling more descriptive and meaningful naming conventions, with components for user interface, modification, information gathering, storage, and remote access to facilitate configuration and monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If manufacturer-assigned procedure names are used, then the system maintains standardized identification, but operator understanding and meaningful differentiation of welding procedures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure identification clarityVSAvoidoperator understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the manufacturer's standardized procedure names and the operator's understanding. This intermediary is the user-defined name assignment capability that translates or supplements manufacturer names with descriptive, task-relevant identifiers. The system maintains both the original manufacturer name and allows custom names, acting as a mediating interface that preserves standardization while enhancing comprehensibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy of the procedure identification system where user-defined names serve as alternative identifiers alongside manufacturer-assigned names. This copying approach allows operators to work with meaningful, descriptive names that reflect their specific applications while the original manufacturer names remain intact for standardization and technical reference purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If comprehensive procedure identification systems are implemented, then operator understanding improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure managementVSAvoidnaming system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the procedure identification function into distinct components: manufacturer-assigned names for standardization and user-defined names for customization. This segmentation allows the system to handle different naming purposes separately, reducing the complexity burden on any single component while providing comprehensive identification capabilities through the combination of both naming systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The naming system is designed with multi-functionality to serve both standardized identification (through manufacturer names) and customized comprehension (through user-defined names). This universal approach allows the same procedure database to fulfill multiple functions simultaneously, avoiding the need for separate parallel systems and thereby reducing overall complexity despite the enhanced capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If user-defined naming is allowed, then customization and meaningful identification improve, but system configuration and control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaming flexibilityVSAvoidconfiguration control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic naming system where user-defined names can be assigned, modified, and removed based on specific operational needs. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to different users, applications, and situations while maintaining a structured underlying framework. The configuration control remains manageable because changes are made at the naming layer without affecting the core procedure parameters or welding process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8115138B2Comprehensive identification and designation of welding procedures
Publication Date: 2012.02.14 LINCOLN GLOBAL INC
  • US8115138B2 patent drawing
  • US8115138B2 patent drawing
  • US8115138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System(s) and method(s) that facilitates comprehensive identification and designation of welding procedures. A configuration component facilitates configuring the welding system with respect to pre-defined procedures and/or parameters and facilitates naming of the configured welding system. A storage component that stores the configured welding system in a readily accessible memory location. A remote access component can facilitate remotely accessing the welding system, the configuration of the welding system alterable by way of the remote access component.