Welding Torch Wire Guide Structure for Kink-Resistant Feeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional arc welding torch devices face challenges with wire kinking due to friction during the feed movement, particularly with thin or soft wires, leading to increased wear and complexity in replacing the wire core and guide elements.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a kink protection mechanism, which is designed to minimize the unguided section of the welding wire, includes a component that extends from the end cap towards the wire feed means, with a conical outer surface and a chamfered recess to facilitate smooth wire entry, reducing the risk of buckling and simplifying the replacement process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the welding wire is fed through a long unguided section from the wire feed device to the torch, then the wire can be easily fed, but the wire is prone to kinking and buckling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire feed easeVSAvoidwire kinking resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The guide element is divided into multiple sections: a first section with a first diameter and a second section with a second diameter. This segmentation allows the wire to be guided through different diameter zones, reducing kinking risk while maintaining feedability. The gradual transition between sections prevents sudden directional changes that cause buckling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide element extends in the axial direction from the end cap toward the wire feed device, creating a three-dimensional guided path. This axial extension provides spatial support to the wire, preventing it from buckling in the unguided radial direction while maintaining ease of feed through the structured passage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If the wire core and guide element are designed as separate replaceable parts, then maintenance is more complex, but each part can be optimized independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart optimizationVSAvoidreplacement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide element is integrated with the end cap as a single unit. This merging eliminates the need for separate replacement of the guide element and end cap, simplifying maintenance to a single replacement operation while maintaining the optimized multi-section guide structure for wire management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated end cap with guide element serves multiple functions: it seals the torch rear opening, guides the wire through its multi-section passage, and provides structural support. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needing replacement while maintaining wire feed performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a rigid guide structure is used to prevent wire kinking, then wire guidance is improved, but the structure increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire guidanceVSAvoidguide structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide element provides localized guidance where most needed - at the rear of the torch where the wire enters. The multi-section design with different diameters creates targeted support zones without requiring a complex guide structure along the entire wire path, maintaining simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly reduces the risk of wire kinking and simplifies the replacement of wire cores and guide elements, enhancing the operational efficiency and reliability of arc welding torch devices, especially when used with hollow shaft robots and soft materials like aluminum.

Implementation Method 1

wire kinking due to friction during the feed movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

conical outer surface and a chamfered recess

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometry: Geometry

Data Source

PatentEP3799993B1Arc welding torch
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 SKS WELDING SYST
  • EP3799993B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3799993B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3799993B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In order to prevent the risk of buckling of a consumable electrode in an arc welding torch device with a consumable electrode, wherein the electrode is designed to move from a rear end of the arc welding torch device towards a front end of the arc welding torch device, in the area of ​​which the electrode melts during an arc welding process, the electrode is guided in the arc welding torch device in a replaceable wire core, wherein the wire core is in turn arranged at least in the area of ​​the rear end of the arc welding torch device in a guide element surrounding the wire core and designed as a replaceable wear part, wherein the guide element of the wire core is designed for the common replacement of the wire core due to wear, in an arc welding torch device,To reduce the risk of bending, particularly of an automatically fed welding wire, a kink protection device for the welding wire is proposed. This device protrudes from the arc welding torch assembly, passes through an outer end cap of the arc welding torch, and is arranged between the outer end cap of the arc welding torch and the wire feeder, and the welding wire is guided within this device.