Well Intervention Planning Using Predictive Success Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current well intervention planning systems require manual user input and expertise, leading to time-consuming and error-prone probability estimations of intervention success, which can result in increased failure risks and costs.

Innovation Solution

An automated well intervention planning system using a predictive model, such as a machine learning model, to predict the probability of success for intervention operations based on historical data and user inputs, generating optimized intervention plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual planning is used, then user expertise and knowledge can be applied, but the process is time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobability of successVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical planning processes with an automated computer system that uses algorithms and data processing to generate intervention plans. The system automatically calculates probabilities of success, determines intervention sequences, and generates detailed operation plans without requiring manual computation, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining reliability through systematic data-driven approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating intervention plans based on input well data and objectives. The computer system independently processes information, selects appropriate interventions, calculates success probabilities, and creates detailed operation plans without requiring continuous manual intervention or expert input for each decision point, thus reducing planning time while maintaining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual probability estimation is used, then user expertise is applied, but human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobability estimation accuracyVSAvoidhuman error
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual probability estimation with automated computational algorithms that process well data, historical information, and intervention parameters to calculate success probabilities objectively. The system uses data processing and computational methods to determine probabilities without human intervention, eliminating human error while maintaining accuracy through systematic calculation based on input data and established models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by using historical well intervention data to validate and refine probability calculations. The computer system continuously references past performance data to adjust and verify its probability estimates, ensuring accuracy through data-driven feedback loops that compare predicted outcomes with actual results from historical interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated planning is used, then efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex intervention planning process into distinct modular components: data input modules, intervention selection modules, probability calculation modules, and operation plan generation modules. Each module handles a specific aspect of planning independently, making the overall system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high automation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional computer platform that can handle various planning scenarios, well types, and intervention methods through a single integrated software environment. The system adapts to different input data formats, well conditions, and intervention objectives using universal algorithms and data structures, reducing the need for multiple specialized systems while maintaining planning efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260073098A1Automatic well intervention plan generator
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260073098A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073098A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073098A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure provide for automated well intervention planning. An automated well intervention planning system includes one or more memories storing computer executable code. The system includes a user interface configured to receive inputs from a user, the input including at least one or more well intervention objectives and one or more well conditions. The system includes one or more processors configured to execute the computer executable code. The one or more processors are configured to search a database for one or more well intervention plans associated the one or more well intervention objectives and the one or more well conditions and generate a well intervention plan based on the one or more well intervention plans.