Well Proximity Calculation via Segment Deconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current well planning methods are computation-intensive, particularly when editing the shape or location of a well plan, which hinders rapid display of changes and efficient proximity calculations between wells and geological features.

Innovation Solution

The method identifies offset wells and features of interest by distance, deconstructs them into discretized segments for proximity analysis, uses envelopes or bounding boxes to account for positional uncertainties, and performs proximity computations only for segments meeting specific criteria, facilitating parallelization and speeding up subsequent computations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If proximity calculations are performed for all offset wells and features, then measurement precision is improved, but computation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity calculation accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the computational domain into discrete segments or bases along well paths. By segmenting the continuous well paths into discrete intervals, the system can efficiently identify and calculate proximities only for relevant segments rather than processing entire well paths, thus reducing computation time while maintaining accuracy for critical proximity assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of offset wells and features of interest before conducting detailed proximity calculations. By pre-identifying which offset wells and features are relevant based on initial distance criteria, the system prepares a filtered set of targets for subsequent detailed analysis, avoiding unnecessary computations on irrelevant features and reducing overall computation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If proximity calculations are performed for all segments, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity analysis accuracyVSAvoidwell planning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses computational resources on specific segments that meet proximity criteria rather than processing all segments uniformly. By taking out only the relevant segments for detailed analysis and excluding irrelevant ones, the system maintains high measurement precision for critical proximity assessments while improving overall productivity by reducing unnecessary computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing detailed proximity calculations only for segments that meet specific proximity criteria, rather than conducting exhaustive calculations on all segments. This selective approach ensures sufficient precision for segments that matter while avoiding excessive computation on segments that do not require detailed analysis, thereby balancing accuracy with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If all offset wells and features are identified, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell plan completenessVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by identifying different types of offset wells and features with different levels of detail and importance. Rather than treating all offset wells and features uniformly, the system selectively identifies and analyzes specific types based on their relevance to the subject well, maintaining reliability for critical features while reducing system complexity by excluding less relevant ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If proximity calculations are performed in real-time during editing, then ease of operation is improved, but computation intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time display capabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by performing proximity calculations at specific intervals or triggers during well plan editing, rather than continuously recalculating with every minor change. This approach enables real-time display capability for users while reducing computational energy consumption by limiting calculations to periodic updates or significant editing events, striking a balance between interactivity and resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3084123B1Proximity calculation in a geoscience domain
Publication Date: 2019.02.20 SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA
  • EP3084123B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3084123B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3084123B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for planning a well are provided. The method includes defining a well in a representation of a domain, and identifying an offset well in the domain that is within a threshold distance of the well. The method also includes deconstructing the offset well into a plurality of offset bases, and determining that a first offset base of the plurality of offset bases is within the threshold distance of the well. The method further includes determining that a second offset base of the plurality of offset bases is not within the threshold distance of the well, and performing a proximity computation for the well with respect to the first offset base but not the second offset base.