Well Tool Control Chamber Pressure Relief Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing design of well tools requires thicker housings to withstand high well pressures, which restricts the cross-sectional area of the fluid passageway due to the need for seals to prevent pressure leaks, leading to potential catastrophic failures if seals leak.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a pressure relief mechanism in the control chamber to relieve excess pressure if it exceeds a threshold, allowing the chamber to be designed for lower pressures and maximizing the inner diameter of the well fluid passageway.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the control chamber housing is designed to withstand high well pressure, then safety against seal leaks is improved, but the cross-sectional area of the fluid passageway is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against seal leaksVSAvoidcross-sectional area of fluid passageway
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into two independent pressure zones: the control chamber designed for low pressure and the wellbore environment at high pressure. The seal divides these zones, and the pressure relief mechanism provides a secondary containment strategy, allowing the control chamber housing to be optimized for low pressure while maintaining safety through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure relief mechanism acts as an intermediary safety device between the high-pressure wellbore environment and the low-pressure control chamber. It monitors pressure differential across the seal and activates to relieve pressure in the event of seal failure, allowing the housing to be designed for lower pressure while maintaining system safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If the housing thickness is increased to withstand well pressure, then pressure containment is improved, but the inner diameter of the passageway is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure containment capabilityVSAvoidinner diameter of passageway
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The housing exhibits local quality differentiation: the main body is designed with sufficient thickness for low-pressure containment, while localized reinforcement is applied only where needed (such as at the seal interface and pressure relief mechanism mounting areas). This allows the passageway to maintain a larger inner diameter while critical areas have enhanced strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the pressure parameter specification for the control chamber housing from withstanding full well pressure to withstanding only low control pressure. This parameter change, enabled by the pressure relief mechanism, directly allows for a larger inner diameter while maintaining adequate pressure containment through targeted local reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If the control chamber is designed for low pressure, then the passageway cross-sectional area is maximized, but vulnerability to seal leaks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassageway cross-sectional areaVSAvoidvulnerability to seal leaks
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure relief mechanism is pre-configured with a predetermined pressure differential threshold. In the event of seal leakage, it automatically activates when the pressure difference between the wellbore and control chamber exceeds this threshold, relieving pressure before it can cause catastrophic failure. This preliminary protective action enables the chamber to be designed for low pressure while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure relief mechanism provides beforehand cushioning by establishing a safety release pathway before any potential seal failure occurs. This pre-established protective measure cushions against the harmful effects of seal leaks, allowing the control chamber to operate at low pressure with maximized passageway area while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively safeguards the well tool against seal leaks by preventing catastrophic failures while maintaining a larger inner diameter for the fluid passageway, thus enhancing operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

providing a pressure relief mechanism to relieve pressure from the chamber in response to the pressure exceeding a threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure relief: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS7938189B2Pressure protection for a control chamber of a well tool
Publication Date: 2011.05.10 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US7938189B2 patent drawing
  • US7938189B2 patent drawing
  • US7938189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique includes providing a chamber in a well tool to receive pressure to control an operation of the tool. The technique includes providing a seal to isolate the chamber from well pressure. The technique also includes providing a pressure relief mechanism to relieve pressure from the chamber in response to the pressure exceeding a threshold.