Well Tractor Drive Arm Layout for Compact High-Force Borehole Traction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing well tractor drive sections face limitations in mechanical advantage due to centrally arranged arm bearings and actuator rods, leading to increased tool length, reduced space efficiency, and instability when encountering borehole restrictions, which restricts the number of tools that can be inserted and causes bending moments.

Innovation Solution

The well tractor drive section features wheel arm bearings and actuator rods positioned oppositely relative to the main axis, providing increased mechanical advantage and a compact design, with an angular gear housing and transmission gear train that allows transverse output shafts to be coaxial with arm bearings, enabling a shorter, more stable tool configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If wheel arm bearings are centrally arranged in the drive section body, then the structure is compact, but the mechanical advantage of the drive arms is reduced and the separation between actuator rods is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural compactnessVSAvoidmechanical advantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by displacing the wheel arm bearings from the central axis to opposite positions relative to it. This asymmetric arrangement increases the perpendicular distance from the actuator rod force application point to the bearing pivot point, thereby increasing the mechanical advantage of the drive arms while maintaining a compact overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Force

If the tool length is increased to accommodate separated actuator rods, then the mechanical advantage increases, but the overall tractor length increases limiting the number of tools that can enter the well

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidtool length
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the length conflict by changing the spatial arrangement from a longitudinal separation to a transverse arrangement. The bearings are positioned at opposite sides of the central axis in the same longitudinal section, allowing actuator rods to be separated laterally rather than axially. This maintains compact tool length while achieving sufficient mechanical advantage through increased lateral separation distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If single point forces are applied by drive wheels against the borehole wall, then the drive force is concentrated, but bending moments are incurred to the drive section and tractor body

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive force concentrationVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the counterweight principle by positioning drive wheels on opposite sides of the central axis. When both wheels apply force against the borehole wall, the forces create opposing bending moments that balance each other, reducing the net bending moment on the drive section and tractor body while maintaining concentrated drive force application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Device complexity

If wheel arms are actuated via a cogged wheel arranged axially at the pivot axis, then the drive mechanism is simplified, but the transverse axial length of the wheel arm increases reducing available space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation mechanism simplicityVSAvoidavailable space in cylindrical housing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the space conflict by changing the actuation mechanism arrangement from an axial configuration to a transverse configuration. The cogged wheels and actuator rods are arranged in the transverse direction rather than axially, reducing the transverse axial length of wheel arms and freeing up axial space within the cylindrical pressure housing while maintaining the same actuation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10927925B2Well tractor drive section with pairs of drive arm bearings mutually oppositely displaced from the centre line
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 C6 TECHNOLOGIES AS
  • US10927925B2 patent drawing
  • US10927925B2 patent drawing
  • US10927925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A well tractor drive section comprising—a drive section body (0) with main central axis (0x), with—first and second drive wheels (10A, 10B) on the outer ends of first and second wheel arms (12A, 12B); inner ends of said wheel arms (12A, 12B) arranged pivotally about first and second transverse axes (8Ax, 8Bx) in first and second transverse-axial wheel arm bearings (14A, 4B) for said wheel arms (12A, 12B) to rotate in a direction away from said main axis (0x) to engage said drive wheels (10A, 10B) with an inner wall of a well; —said first and second transverse-axes (8Ax, 8Bx) being mutually oppositely laterally displaced with a first separation (d1) from said main central axis (0x) in a common perpendicular plane (8P) relative to said main central axis (0x).