Concentric Wellbore Casing Evaluation Tool Using Electromagnetic Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating wellbore casing conditions are inefficient and costly, particularly in offshore platforms, as they often require removal of casings to detect defects, which can be time-consuming and expensive.

Innovation Solution

The use of a combination of eddy current (EC), magnetic flux leakage (MFL), and electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) techniques to non-invasively evaluate multiple concentric wellbore casings by generating excitation signals and analyzing response signals to detect defects without the need for casing removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If casing removal is used to detect defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but time consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of casing removal with electromagnetic field-based inspection methods (eddy current, magnetic flux leakage, and acoustic wave techniques). These electromagnetic and acoustic fields can penetrate the casing material and detect defects non-invasively, eliminating the need for physical removal while maintaining defect detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces electromagnetic fields and acoustic waves as intermediary carriers to detect defects through the casing material. These intermediaries can interact with the casing structure and transmit defect information to sensors without requiring direct physical contact or removal of the casing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If casing removal is used to detect defects, then defect detection capability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the costly mechanical system of casing removal with electromagnetic field-based inspection methods. These methods use electrical energy to generate electromagnetic fields and acoustic waves, which are significantly less expensive than the labor, equipment, and downtime costs associated with physical casing removal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces electromagnetic fields and acoustic waves as intermediaries that can be generated and detected using relatively simple and cost-effective equipment compared to the complex operations required for casing removal, inspection, and reinstallation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple EC coils are used to evaluate concentric casings, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but signal differentiation becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsignal differentiation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inspection process by using different types of coils (eddy current coils, magnetic flux leakage coils, and acoustic wave coils) that are sensitive to different physical phenomena. Each coil type responds differently to defects in inner versus outer casings, allowing the system to differentiate between concentric casings through signal characteristics rather than requiring complex spatial separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the inspection system by using multiple coil types that operate on different electromagnetic and acoustic principles. This creates distinct signal signatures for defects in different casings, enabling differentiation through parameter-based discrimination rather than spatial segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate monitoring and differentiation of defects in wellbore casings, improving the evaluation of inner and outer casings, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs by avoiding costly removal procedures.

Implementation Method 1

eddy current (EC), magnetic flux leakage (MFL), and electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

magnetic flux leakage (MFL)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux leakage: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic acoustic transducer: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9562877B2Evaluation tool for concentric wellbore casings
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US9562877B2 patent drawing
  • US9562877B2 patent drawing
  • US9562877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprises one or more first electromagnetic coils configured to generate and direct first excitation signals toward a plurality of casings in a wellbore and receive response signals based on the excitation signals. The system also comprises a magnetic field source configured to generate a static magnetic field in a particular casing of the plurality of casings and a magnetometer configured to receive response signals based on the static magnetic field in the particular casing. The system further comprises one or more processors configured to receive a first response signal from the one or more electromagnetic coils, receive a second response signal from the magnetometer, and determine, based on the first response signal and the second response signal, whether a defect exists in the plurality of casings.