Wellbore Cleanup Optimization With Emissions-Aware Choke Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wellbore cleanup technologies fail to consider emissions and environmental impact, leading to potential job stoppages and increased costs due to exceeding environmental standards, and lack efficient optimization schemes.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage multi-objective optimization scheme that integrates a cleanup simulator, emissions engine, and aggregator to optimize wellbore cleanup by minimizing emissions, time, and ensuring safe operations through a choke schedule.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional wellbore cleanup technologies pump materials from the wellbore at maximum speed to accelerate completion, then productivity is improved, but emissions and environmental contamination increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore cleanup speedVSAvoidemissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting operational parameters (flow rate, pressure, choke settings) during wellbore cleanup to optimize the balance between productivity and emissions. The system monitors and modifies these parameters in real-time to maintain efficient cleanup while staying within environmental thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor emissions levels and operational parameters during wellbore cleanup. This feedback loop allows the system to detect when emissions approach threshold values and automatically adjust operational parameters to prevent exceedance, thereby maintaining both productivity and environmental compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If operators ignore environmental concerns to maintain continuous operations, then productivity is improved, but harmful factors increase and permit thresholds are exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidenvironmental contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing emissions monitoring and optimization systems before wellbore cleanup operations begin. The system pre-configures emission thresholds, monitoring protocols, and response strategies to prevent permit exceedance before it occurs, ensuring continuous compliant operations throughout the cleanup process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional technologies run equipment at maximum speed without optimization, then productivity is improved, but loss of time occurs due to job stoppages for compliance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial cleanup rateVSAvoidoperational interruptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback monitoring of emissions levels during wellbore cleanup operations. This allows operators to detect approaching threshold values and adjust parameters proactively, preventing job stoppages and maintaining continuous productive operations throughout the cleanup process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static maximum-speed operation to dynamic parameter adjustment. The system continuously adapts operational parameters based on real-time emissions monitoring, allowing the cleanup process to maintain optimal speed while responding flexibly to changing conditions to avoid compliance interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-generated harmful factors

If a comprehensive optimization scheme considering emissions is implemented, then harmful factors are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing an optimization system that performs multiple functions: monitoring emissions, tracking operational parameters, predicting threshold approaches, and suggesting parameter adjustments. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a unified platform, reducing overall complexity while achieving comprehensive emissions management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250341139A1Two-stage multi-objective optimization scheme for wellbore cleanup with an emissions measure
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20250341139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341139A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341139A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments presented provide for a method for calculation of an optimal scheme for wellbore cleanup. In embodiments, an emissions measure is used to minimize environmental impact from wellbore cleanup activities while establishing the most efficient steps and techniques to be performed during the cleanup activities.