Wellbore Control Device Self-Closing Gate Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional blowout preventers (BOPs) lack the ability to self-close in high internal pressure situations, relying on surface pressure or biasing devices that can fail or be ineffective, and are not fully pressure-balanced, leading to potential wellbore unsealing issues in subsea environments.

Innovation Solution

A wellbore control device with a gate mechanism where a first stem is attached to the gate and a second stem is releasably engageable, both exposed to internal and external pressures, allowing the gate to self-close when internal pressure exceeds external pressure, and re-engage when pressures balance, ensuring the wellbore remains sealed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional BOPs use surface pressure or biasing devices to close rams, then the wellbore can be sealed, but the system cannot self-close in high internal pressure situations and may fail when surface pressure fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to self-close in high internal pressureVSAvoiddependence on surface pressure systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of high internal pressure into a beneficial self-closing force. When internal pressure exceeds external pressure, the pressure differential acts on the stems to automatically drive the gate closed, transforming a dangerous condition into a safety mechanism that requires no external power or control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The wellbore control device performs self-service by automatically closing when internal pressure exceeds external pressure. The pressure differential itself provides the actuating force, eliminating the need for external hydraulic systems, surface pressure, or complex control mechanisms to detect and respond to high pressure conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If pressure-balanced configuration with dual stems is used, then the device is balanced at all times, but closure is still dependent on external closure force from surface or biasing devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure balance at all timesVSAvoidclosure capability without external force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static pressure-balanced system to a dynamic one where the balance can be temporarily disrupted to enable automatic closure. When internal pressure exceeds external pressure, the dynamic pressure differential overrides the static balance and drives the gate closed, after which the system returns to its pressure-balanced state with the gate sealed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If biased rams are used to sever riser and tool string, then cutting capability is achieved, but the biasing devices are extremely heavy and may seize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting force through riser and tool stringVSAvoidweight of biasing devices
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy mechanical biasing devices with a pressure-differential-based actuation system. Instead of relying on massive springs or nitrogen accumulators, the gate is closed using the force generated by the pressure differential acting on the stems, eliminating the need for heavy biasing components while maintaining sufficient cutting force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If rams extend out of BOP housing into surrounding water, then control is possible, but external pressure acts on ram ends to close rams when internal pressure is lower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control capabilityVSAvoidunintended closure from external pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the gate from the traditional ram configuration and replaces it with a gate mechanism that eliminates the problematic exposed ram ends. The gate design with stems that are partially exposed to both internal and external pressure removes the asymmetry that caused unintended closure, allowing the gate to respond only to pressure differentials rather than absolute external pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively self-closes the wellbore in high internal pressure scenarios, preventing unsealing and maintaining pressure balance, even when surface pressure or biasing systems fail, enhancing safety in subsea operations.

Implementation Method 1

when the internal pressure is greater than the external pressure, the pressure differential results in a force being applied to the gate to move the gate to, or retain the gate in, the throughbore closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

If the hydrostatic or external pressure on the seabed is greater than the pressure in the BOP (wellbore pressure), the external pressure will act on the ends of the rams to close the rams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2588708B1Wellbore control device
Publication Date: 2018.04.25 ENOVATE SYST
  • EP2588708B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2588708B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2588708B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A wellbore control device for use in a blow out preventer is described. The control device comprising a housing defining a throughbore, a gate, the gate being movable between a throughbore open position and a throughbore closed position, a first stem attached to the gate and a second stem releasab!y engageable with the gate, the first and second stems being arranged such that a portion of each stem is exposed to an internal housing pressure and a portion of each stem is exposed to an external housing pressure. When the internal pressure is greater than the external pressure, the pressure differential results in a force being applied to the gate to move the gate to, or retain the gate in, the throughbore closed position.