Wellbore DAS Inflow Detection for Continuous Fluid Phase Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing production logging systems (PLS) provide inaccurate and discontinuous measurements of fluid inflows in hydrocarbon wells due to their intrusive nature and brief exposure times, leading to skewed data and inability to monitor dynamic fluid changes over time.

Innovation Solution

A method using distributed acoustic sensors (DAS) to obtain acoustic signals across wellbore depths, analyze frequency domain features, and develop a fluid flow model for real-time identification of gas, aqueous, and hydrocarbon liquid inflows, enabling continuous monitoring and accurate fluid discrimination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a Production Logging System (PLS) is used to measure fluid inflows, then fluid profile and inflow rate can be assessed, but the measurements are skewed due to the intrusive nature of the tool and brief exposure time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid inflow measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical intrusive PLS tool with a DAS system that uses acoustic signals transmitted through the wellbore environment. This substitution eliminates the mechanical interference that skews measurements while maintaining the ability to detect fluid inflows through acoustic signature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The DAS system enables continuous monitoring of fluid inflows over extended periods, unlike the brief exposure time of PLS tools. The system continuously captures acoustic signals that can be analyzed to detect and track fluid inflow events throughout the wellbore, providing ongoing reliable data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Loss of time

If a PLS tool is run through a well once or a few times, then cost is reduced, but the sensors are exposed to conditions for only a brief period of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure timeVSAvoidfluid condition data
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The DAS system allows continuous exposure and monitoring of fluid conditions over time, eliminating the brief exposure limitation. Acoustic signals are continuously captured and analyzed, enabling the system to track fluid inflow events, changes in flow regime, and temporal variations in fluid composition throughout the wellbore.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary characterization of acoustic signatures for different fluid types and flow regimes during training phases. This preliminary action enables the system to recognize and identify fluid inflow events in real-time without requiring repeated tool runs, preserving information over extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If PLS sensors are distributed along the length of the tool, then circumferential flow profile can be assessed, but data is skewed by variability in flow regime caused by intrusive measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow profile assessment capabilityVSAvoidflow regime measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the intrusive mechanical sensors with acoustic sensing that passively captures flow information through the wellbore environment. This substitution maintains the ability to assess flow profiles while eliminating the mechanical interference that causes data skewing and variability in flow regime measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses acoustic signals as an intermediary to transmit information about fluid flows and flow regimes without direct mechanical contact. The acoustic signals serve as a mediator that captures flow characteristics while avoiding the intrusive effects of physical sensors in the flow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time and continuous monitoring of fluid inflows, allowing for targeted remediation actions to optimize production and reduce operational risks by providing precise fluid flow rates and locations.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining an acoustic signal from a sensor within the wellbore, wherein the acoustic signal comprises acoustic samples across a portion of a depth of the wellbore

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS12571301B2DAS data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 BP EXPLORATION OPERATING CO LTD
  • US12571301B2 patent drawing
  • US12571301B2 patent drawing
  • US12571301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of identifying inflow locations along a wellbore comprises obtaining an acoustic signal from a sensor within the wellbore, determining a plurality of frequency domain features from the acoustic signal, and identifying, using a plurality of fluid flow models, a presence of at least one of a gas phase inflow, an aqueous phase inflow, or a hydrocarbon liquid phase inflow at one or more fluid flow locations. The acoustic signal comprises acoustic samples across a portion of a depth of the wellbore, and the plurality of frequency domain features are obtained across a plurality of depth intervals within the portion of the depth of the wellbore. Each fluid flow model of the plurality of fluid inflow models uses one or more frequency domain features of the plurality of the frequency domain features, and at least two of the plurality of fluid flow models are different.