Wellbore Data Anonymization for Confidential Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Downhole exploration and production efforts face challenges in anonymizing data collected from wellbore operations to protect confidential and proprietary information, which hinders the sharing and analysis of this data without compromising sensitive information.

Innovation Solution

The techniques involve anonymizing data through shuffling, normalization, and non-dimensionalization to remove identifiable information, using encryption methods like parallelized block chaining or stream ciphers, and aggregate signature extraction schemes, allowing for secure data sharing and analysis while maintaining confidentiality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data is shared and analyzed across wellbores, then productivity and decision-making quality improve, but confidential and proprietary information may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sharing efficiencyVSAvoidconfidential information protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes identifiable information from downhole data through anonymization techniques. Specifically, it removes wellbore identifiers, location data, and proprietary parameters while retaining the technical characteristics needed for analysis. This allows data to be shared for productivity improvement without exposing confidential information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces anonymized data as an intermediary between the original data source and the analysis system. This intermediary form preserves the analytical value of the data while eliminating direct exposure of proprietary information. The anonymization process acts as a mediator that enables data sharing while protecting confidentiality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If data is anonymized through shuffling, normalization, and non-dimensionalization, then confidentiality is protected, but data complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidential information protectionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies anonymization techniques (shuffling, normalization, non-dimensionalization) as preliminary actions before data sharing. By pre-processing the data to remove identifiable information, the system reduces the complexity of protecting confidential information during subsequent analysis and sharing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms data parameters through normalization and non-dimensionalization, changing the scale and units of measurement while preserving the underlying relationships. This parameter transformation enables confidentiality protection without requiring complex encryption or obfuscation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If anonymized data models are aggregated across multiple wellbores, then analysis quality and decision-making improve, but the risk of re-identification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoiddata anonymity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges anonymized data from multiple wellbores into aggregated models. By combining data from multiple sources, the system improves analysis accuracy through increased statistical power and broader coverage, while the aggregation itself provides an additional layer of protection against re-identification of individual wellbores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies excessive anonymization measures by implementing multiple anonymization techniques (shuffling, normalization, non-dimensionalization) simultaneously. This excessive approach ensures that even when data is aggregated from multiple wellbores, the probability of re-identification remains negligibly low, while still maintaining sufficient data quality for accurate analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3775482B1Performing an action at a wellbore operation based on anonymized data
Publication Date: 2024.03.27 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • EP3775482B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3775482B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3775482B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Examples of techniques for anonymizing data are disclosed. In one example implementation according to aspects of the present disclosure, a computer-implemented method includes receiving, by a processing device, raw data from a wellbore operation. The raw data can be associated with depths. The method further includes anonymizing, by the processing device, the raw data to convert the raw data to anonymized data. One or more techniques can be implemented to anonymize the data, such as shuffling the raw data, normalizing the raw data, and/or non-dimensionalizing the raw data. The method further includes analyzing, by the processing device, the anonymized data. The method further includes performing an action at the wellbore operation based at least in part on the analysis of the anonymized data.