Variable Flow Resistance for Wellbore Coning Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in effectively regulating fluid flow in subterranean wells, particularly in preventing water or gas coning, minimizing undesired fluid production, and maximizing desired fluid production, as they lack efficient mechanisms to variably restrict fluid flow based on characteristics like velocity and viscosity.

Innovation Solution

A variable flow resistance system is introduced, comprising a sensor to measure fluid properties and an actuator to adjust flow rates, which can increase or decrease resistance based on measured characteristics, ensuring optimal fluid management within the wellbore.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed flow restrictor is used in the wellbore, then fluid flow can be restricted to some extent, but the system cannot adapt to varying fluid properties such as viscosity and velocity, limiting its effectiveness in preventing coning and optimizing production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to fluid propertiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow restrictor is transformed from a static component to a dynamic one by introducing an actuator that can adjust the restrictor opening based on real-time fluid property measurements. The system dynamically adapts to changing fluid conditions (viscosity, velocity) by modifying the restrictor geometry, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity through controlled dynamic adjustment rather than complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor measures fluid properties (viscosity, velocity) and feeds this information back to a controller, which then adjusts the actuator to modify the restrictor opening. This closed-loop feedback system enables the flow restrictor to automatically adapt to varying fluid conditions without requiring complex manual intervention or complete system replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 3:

The system uses the fluid's own properties (measured by the sensor) to automatically control its own flow restriction. The fluid characteristics directly influence the restrictor opening through the sensor-actuator-controller loop, allowing the system to self-regulate based on the actual fluid conditions without external intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If flow resistance is increased to prevent water or gas coning, then coning can be minimized, but the system cannot differentiate between desired and undesired fluids, potentially reducing desired fluid production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconing preventionVSAvoiddesired fluid production
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different flow resistance levels to different fluid types by measuring fluid properties (such as resistivity or density) and selectively adjusting the restrictor opening. Desired fluids (e.g., hydrocarbons) experience lower resistance while undesired fluids (e.g., water, gas) experience higher resistance, resolving the contradiction by creating quality-based differentiation in flow management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow resistance parameter dynamically based on measured fluid properties. When undesired fluids are detected (through sensor measurements of properties like resistivity, density, or velocity), the controller increases the restrictor opening to create higher resistance. When desired fluids are detected, the restrictor opening is reduced to minimize resistance, thereby optimizing both coning prevention and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a sensor and actuator system is added to measure and control fluid flow, then flow regulation capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow regulation capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is designed to measure multiple fluid properties (viscosity, velocity, density, resistivity) simultaneously, and the actuator serves multiple control functions by adjusting the restrictor opening based on different measurement inputs. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each measurement and control task, thereby improving ease of operation while limiting the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11753910B2Variable flow resistance system for use with a subterranean well
Publication Date: 2023.09.12 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US11753910B2 patent drawing
  • US11753910B2 patent drawing
  • US11753910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A variable flow resistance system for use with a subterranean well includes a first flow path configured to receive a fluid, a sensor configured to measure a property of the fluid received into the first flow path, and an actuator configured to control an inflow rate of the fluid received into the first flow path based upon the property of the fluid measured by the sensor.