Automated Wellbore Landing Zone Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual and tedious process of determining the wellbore landing zone in multiple subterranean layers within a hydrocarbon reservoir is prone to human errors, lacking efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that creates independent subsurface geological models from directional and vertical well surveys to predict the landing zone of wellbores, correlating the predictions and updating the models with new data for accurate assignment to specific formations, thereby reducing manual intervention and enhancing accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual methods using subsea depth maps and vertical well logs are used to determine wellbore landing zones, then geologists can identify targeted formations, but the process is very manual and tedious and can lead to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of wellbore assignmentVSAvoidmanual working hours
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual geological analysis methods with an automated computer-implemented system that uses machine learning models and algorithms to determine wellbore landing zones. The system automatically processes well survey data, seismic data, and geological models to assign wellbores to formations, eliminating the need for manual interpretation of depth maps and well logs by geologists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the automated landing zone determination process to operate independently without requiring continuous manual intervention. The machine learning models automatically train on historical data and continuously improve their accuracy, and the system can process new well data as it becomes available without requiring geologist involvement for each individual wellbore assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual methods are used to determine wellbore landing zones, then geologists can interpret formation targets, but the process is prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of wellbore assignmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex task of wellbore landing zone determination into multiple independent components: data acquisition modules, machine learning model training, prediction generation, and result validation. The system uses separate models for different geological scenarios and can process different data types independently, making the overall complex system manageable and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where prediction results are validated against known geological data and historical well outcomes. The machine learning models continuously learn from new well data and update their parameters to improve accuracy. Geologists can provide feedback on prediction accuracy, which is used to refine the models further, creating a self-improving system that reduces errors over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11579334B2Determining a wellbore landing zone
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 ENVERUS INC
  • US11579334B2 patent drawing
  • US11579334B2 patent drawing
  • US11579334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for predicting a landing zone of a wellbore include identifying a first subsurface geological model of a first subterranean layer located under a terranean surface that includes an upper boundary depth of the first subterranean layer and a lower boundary depth of the first subterranean layer; identifying a second subsurface geological model of a second subterranean layer deeper than the first subterranean layer that is independent of the first subsurface geological model and includes an upper boundary depth of the second subterranean layer; correlating a predicted landing zone for a plurality of wellbores using the first and second subsurface geological models that is based on a location of a horizontal portion of each wellbore; and generating data that comprises a representation of the correlated plurality of wellbores for presentation on a graphical user interface (GUI).