Wellbore Plug Design for Pressure Resistance and Milling Ease

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wellbore setting tools and plugs are complex, time-consuming, and costly to install and remove, with traditional plugs requiring substantial time for milling due to high pressure resistance and complex structures.

Innovation Solution

A simplified setting tool-plug system with a rod extending through the plug, featuring shear elements and a chamber for a restriction element, allowing for easy installation and removal without needing to retrieve the setting tool, and a plug design with minimal milling resistance using a central hole as a check valve and wedged slips for sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional plugs are designed to withstand high pressure, then pressure resistance is improved, but milling time increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure resistanceVSAvoidmilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The plug is divided into two distinct parts: a first part made from high-pressure resistant material and a second part made from easily millable material. This segmentation allows each part to fulfill its specific function optimally - the first part withstands wellbore pressure while the second part enables quick milling removal after operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the plug have different material properties tailored to their specific functions. The first part uses high-strength material for pressure resistance, while the second part uses soft, easily removable material for rapid milling. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between durability and ease of removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If setting tool structure is simplified, then ease of operation is improved, but functionality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidfunctional reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The setting tool is separated into an independent retrieval mechanism and the plug setting mechanism. The retrieval mechanism uses a simple ball and trap system that operates independently, simplifying the overall tool structure while maintaining reliable plug setting functionality through the dedicated setting mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ball retrieval function is integrated into the setting tool structure through a trap mechanism, combining two functions (plug setting and ball retrieval) into a single device without significantly increasing complexity. This merging maintains functional reliability while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of time

If setting tool is left in the well, then time for retrieval is reduced, but risk of loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval timeVSAvoidtool recovery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ball is extracted from the setting tool chamber and trapped in a separate location within the wellbore. This extraction allows the setting tool to be retrieved without the ball, eliminating the risk of losing both components together while maintaining a controlled retrieval process through the trap mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The trap mechanism acts as an intermediary that holds the ball in a controlled position. This intermediary structure enables the ball to be separated from the setting tool while maintaining system control, allowing safe retrieval of the setting tool without risking loss of critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates efficient and cost-effective plugging and milling operations by eliminating the need for complex mechanisms and reducing the time required for plug installation and removal, while maintaining high pressure resistance and fluid control capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

The first material is to resist compression forces applied by wellbore fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression resistance: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The second material is different from the first material and is to resist less to being milled than the first material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMilling resistance reduction: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS10920515B2Device and method for retrieving a restriction element from a well
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 WELLS FARGO BANK NAT ASSOC
  • US10920515B2 patent drawing
  • US10920515B2 patent drawing
  • US10920515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A setting tool (402) for setting a plug in a well, the setting tool (402) including a body (404) extending along a longitudinal axis X; a rod (408) extending along the longitudinal axis of the body (404), from an upstream end (402B) to a downstream end (402A) of the body (404); a chamber (406) formed at the downstream end (402A) of the body; and a restriction element (450) located in the chamber (406). The rod (408) extends through the entire chamber (406) and the restriction element (450) is located between the rod (408) and a wall (404A) of the chamber (406).