Wellbore Prediction Tuning via Historical Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accurately predicting wellbore operation parameters, such as pressure, is challenging due to discrepancies between predicted and measured values, leading to potential inaccuracies in wellbore operations.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates predicted values and determines a tuning factor based on historical data, adjusting the predictions using linear regression or moving averages to produce more accurate 'tuned' values, which are then visually validated and used for reliable decision-making in wellbore operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional prediction methods are used for wellbore operation parameters, then the prediction process is simple, but the prediction accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing predicted parameter values with actual measured values from sensors, calculating the difference (error), and using this feedback to adjust and refine future predictions through a tuning factor, thereby improving prediction accuracy over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by introducing a tuning factor that adjusts the predicted values based on historical prediction errors. This parameter adjustment transforms the raw prediction into a corrected prediction that accounts for systematic deviations, directly addressing the accuracy issue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If predicted values are used directly without adjustment, then the prediction process is fast, but the reliability of wellbore operations is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidtime for prediction adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating a tuning factor based on historical data before actual wellbore operations begin. This pre-adjustment mechanism ensures that predictions are already optimized for the specific wellbore conditions, reducing the need for real-time adjustments and maintaining operational speed while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If tuning factor adjustment is applied to improve prediction accuracy, then prediction reliability increases, but the complexity of the prediction system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically calculating and applying the tuning factor without requiring manual intervention or complex external calibration equipment. The system uses its own historical prediction errors to self-adjust, which improves accuracy while keeping the added complexity minimal and contained within the existing software framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10876391B2Tuning predictions of wellbore operation parameters
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10876391B2 patent drawing
  • US10876391B2 patent drawing
  • US10876391B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for use in a wellbore can include a computing device including a processing device and a memory device that stores instructions executable by the processing device. The instructions can cause the processing device to generate a predicted value of a parameter associated with a well environment or a wellbore operation. The instructions can also cause the processing device to determine a tuning factor for adjusting the predicted value based on historical data. The instructions can also cause the processing device to apply the tuning factor to the predicted value to generate a tuned predicted value. The instructions can further cause the processing device to generate an interface for display that includes a data point associated with the tuned predicted value plotted on a graph.