Wellbore Pressure Prediction Using Radial Diffusivity Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current well control methods require lengthy shut-in periods to stabilize shut-in casing pressure (SICP) and shut-in drill pipe pressure (SIDPP) after a kick event, leading to potential inaccuracies and increased safety and nonproductive time risks due to gradual pressure build-up, especially in wells with low permeability formations.

Innovation Solution

A method using real-time pressure data from subterranean casing, drill pipe, and wellhead sensors to perform a parametric non-linear regression analysis based on the radial diffusivity equation, predicting stabilized pressures with a best-fit curve that significantly reduces the time needed to establish accurate SICP and SIDPP values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the well is kept shut in for many hours to allow pressures to stabilize, then the SICP and SIDPP readings become stable, but the time required increases significantly and accuracy may still be compromised due to very gradual pressure build-up

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSICP and SIDPP reading accuracyVSAvoidshut-in time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pressure measurements and regression analysis during the initial shut-in period to predict the stabilized pressure values before full stabilization occurs. This allows operators to prepare kill weight mud formulations in advance, reducing the total shut-in time required while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors pressure build-up and uses regression analysis to provide feedback on the predicted stabilized pressure values. This feedback mechanism allows operators to track the pressure evolution and confirm when the predicted values are achieved, eliminating the need for extended waiting periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the well is shut in for a short period, then the time loss is reduced, but the SICP and SIDPP readings remain unstable and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-in timeVSAvoidSICP and SIDPP reading accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary pressure measurements and regression analysis during the initial shut-in period to predict the stabilized pressure values before full stabilization occurs. This allows operators to prepare kill weight mud formulations in advance, reducing the total shut-in time required while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical waiting period for pressure stabilization with a mathematical prediction model based on regression analysis. This substitution allows the system to estimate stabilized pressure values without requiring the physical time for pressures to naturally stabilize.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If inaccurate SICP values are chosen, then the well control process proceeds faster, but the well may be circulated in an underbalanced state increasing safety and environmental risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell control speedVSAvoidwell control safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors pressure build-up and uses regression analysis to provide feedback on the predicted stabilized pressure values. This feedback mechanism allows operators to track the pressure evolution and confirm when the predicted values are achieved, eliminating the need for extended waiting periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary pressure measurements and regression analysis during the initial shut-in period to predict the stabilized pressure values before full stabilization occurs. This allows operators to prepare kill weight mud formulations in advance, reducing the total shut-in time required while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate prediction of stabilized pressures within 10-15% of the time typically required by conventional methods, achieving a high R-squared fit and precise kill weight mud calculation, thereby enhancing safety and efficiency in well control operations by reducing underbalanced states and nonproductive time.

Implementation Method 1

The regression analysis is a parametric non-linear robust fitting regression performed around a form of the radial diffusivity equation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial diffusivity equation: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS20180216428A1Systems and methods for well control using pressure prediction
Publication Date: 2018.08.02 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US20180216428A1 patent drawing
  • US20180216428A1 patent drawing
  • US20180216428A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems and methods for predicting a stabilized pressure in a wellbore of a well after an undesired influx of formation fluids, i.e., a kick, into the wellbore in a real-time drilling operation. Following the kick, the well is shut in. Signals representing pressure data associated with the subterranean casing, drill pipe, wellhead, and/or the bottomhole assembly and associated time data are received in a processor. A regression analysis is performed using the pressure data and associated time data in the processor and solved for a predicted stabilized pressure associated with the subterranean casing, the drill pipe, the wellhead, and/or the bottomhole assembly respectively. The regression analysis is performed around a variant of the radial diffusivity equation describing the rate-pressure relationship for flow of a production fluid. The predicted stabilized pressure is communicated to a user.