Controlled Axle Wheel Adhesion Recovery With Adaptive Torque Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wheel adhesion control systems for railway vehicles face challenges in accurately adapting to real-time variations in adhesion and weight, leading to inadequate control responses to rapid environmental changes and oscillations around set point speeds.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive filtering techniques, specifically using LMS-type filters with FIR or IIR structures, for continuous dynamic correction of control parameters, allowing for real-time adaptation to instantaneous adhesion and weight changes, and incorporating self-tuning mechanisms to maintain responsive control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional wheel adhesion control systems are used, then basic wheel slide protection is provided, but the system cannot accurately adapt to real-time variations in adhesion and weight, leading to inadequate control responses to rapid environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to real-time adhesion and weight variationsVSAvoidcontrol response accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from static parameter settings to dynamic adaptation by continuously estimating adhesion coefficient and vehicle weight in real-time. The system adjusts control parameters dynamically based on changing environmental conditions and operational states, enabling accurate response to rapid adhesion variations while maintaining reliability through continuous feedback and parameter updating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (adhesion coefficient estimation, weight estimation, torque modulation factors) based on real-time measurements and observations. By continuously updating these parameters through sensor data and control responses, the system adapts to varying adhesion conditions and weight distributions, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional control systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but oscillations occur around set point speeds due to inadequate adaptation to environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed control stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor wheel speed, torque application, and adhesion conditions. By feeding back this information to continuously update adhesion coefficient and weight estimates, the system achieves stable speed control without excessive oscillations. The feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to environmental changes while maintaining stability, justifying the increased complexity through improved performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-tuning by automatically adjusting its own parameters based on observed performance and environmental conditions. The system monitors its own control responses and uses this information to refine adhesion and weight estimates, enabling stable operation without requiring external intervention or overly complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If adaptive filtering techniques are implemented for continuous dynamic correction, then real-time adaptation to instantaneous adhesion and weight changes is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion and weight estimation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms with computational algorithms for parameter estimation and adaptation. By using software-based adaptive filtering and estimation techniques rather than physical adjustment mechanisms, the system achieves high measurement precision for adhesion and weight while managing complexity through digital processing rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11772495B2Method and system for controlling and recovering adhesion of the wheels of a controlled axle of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 FAIVELEY TRANSPORT ITAL SPA
  • US11772495B2 patent drawing
  • US11772495B2 patent drawing
  • US11772495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method comprises the steps of generating speed signals indicative of the angular speed of the wheels of said axle; generating an error signal indicative of the error or difference between a set point speed for the wheels, determined by means of a reference model, and the speed indicated by said speed signals; and generating a driving signal for torque-controlling apparatuses applied to the wheels of said axle, by adaptive filtering of an input signal which is a function of said set point speed, modifying parameters of the adaptive filtering as a function of said error signal, such as to make such speed error or difference tend to zero.