Deburring Device for Wheel Back Cavity with Adjustable Brush System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deburring methods for aluminum-alloy wheels are inadequate, particularly for complex shapes, and traditional equipment is inflexible, requiring frequent changes in brush systems when switching between different wheel sizes, which significantly affects production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A deburring device with an automatically adjustable brush system that allows for brushing forces of different directions to be applied to the back cavity of a wheel, utilizing a complex mechanism involving motors, belt pulleys, synchronizing belts, gear racks, and servo motors to accommodate wheels of various sizes and shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional deburring equipment is used with fixed brush systems, then the structure is simple and easy to operate, but the adaptability to different wheel sizes and shapes is poor, requiring frequent replacement of brush systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different wheel sizesVSAvoidcomplexity of brush system adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamically adjustable brush system where the brush wheel diameter can be continuously changed during operation. The brush wheel comprises multiple adjustable brush layers that can be independently positioned along the radial direction, allowing the effective brushing radius to be adapted to different wheel sizes without replacing entire brush systems. This dynamic adjustment capability resolves the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The deburring device is designed with a universal brush system that can handle multiple wheel types and sizes through automated adjustment. The control system receives wheel dimension information and automatically configures the brush parameters (diameter, pressure, rotation speed) to match different wheel specifications, making a single device capable of performing deburring operations on various wheel variants without requiring multiple dedicated brush systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional deburring equipment with single-direction brushing is used, then the device complexity is low, but the ability to remove burrs from complex shapes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to handle complex wheel shapesVSAvoidcomplexity of multi-directional brushing mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brush system is segmented into multiple independent brushing units arranged in different spatial directions. Each brush layer can be independently controlled and positioned, allowing selective activation of specific brushing directions based on the wheel geometry and burr location. This segmentation enables comprehensive coverage of complex wheel surfaces while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from single-direction brushing to multi-dimensional brushing by arranging brush layers radially and axially. The brush wheels can rotate around the wheel circumference while also applying radial pressure, creating two-dimensional brushing coverage. Additionally, multiple brush layers at different angular positions provide three-dimensional deburring capability, effectively removing burrs from complex surfaces that single-direction brushes cannot access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If frequent replacement of brush systems is performed for different wheel sizes, then the device can be optimized for each wheel type, but the production efficiency is seriously affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidtime for brush system replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The deburring device incorporates an automated control system that performs self-adjustment of brush parameters based on input wheel dimension data. The system automatically calculates and configures the optimal brush diameter, pressure, and rotation speed without requiring manual intervention or physical replacement of brush components. This self-service capability eliminates downtime associated with brush system changes and maintains continuous production flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment of the brush system through electronic control. Instead of physically replacing brush systems, the control system modifies operational parameters (brush wheel rotation speed, radial pressure, effective radius) to match different wheel specifications. This parameter-based adaptation allows instantaneous reconfiguration between different wheel types, eliminating the time loss associated with mechanical replacement while maintaining optimal deburring performance for each wheel variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Extent of automation

If a complex mechanism with multiple motors and adjustment systems is implemented, then the automation level and adaptability improve, but the device complexity and initial investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of brush system adjustmentVSAvoidnumber of motors and control components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment mechanisms with automated electronic control systems. Instead of using complex mechanical linkages, gears, and manual positioning devices, the system employs electronic sensors to detect wheel dimensions and uses motorized actuators with closed-loop control to automatically position and adjust brush parameters. This substitution of mechanical systems with electronically controlled systems reduces the physical complexity of the mechanism while achieving higher automation levels and more precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10213890B2Deburring device for back cavity of wheel
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 CITIC DICASTAL CO LTD
  • US10213890B2 patent drawing
  • US10213890B2 patent drawing
  • US10213890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a deburring device for a back cavity of a wheel, composed of a machine frame, a clamping and rotating system, a rising and falling translation system and brush units. Jaws clamp a wheel on a roller way, upper cylinders enable the wheel to rise through four upper guide posts, and a first servo motor enables the wheel to move to upsides of conical sleeves through a second gear rack and a second gear; the upper cylinders enable the wheel to fall, and outer sides of the four jaws are in fit with the conical sleeves; a second motor enables the wheel to rotate in a clamped state; a first motor drives a bottom plate and a brush system to rotate in a circumferential direction through a first synchronizing belt; a second servo motor drives a first brush to rotate, a third servo motor drives a second brush to rotate, and brush hairs of the two brushes apply brushing forces of different directions to a back cavity of the wheel; a direction of rotation of the wheel is opposite to that of the brush system; and lower cylinders enable the brush system to rise through lower guide posts, and the brush system can carry out deburring when the brush system is in contact with the back cavity of the wheel.