Vehicle Wheel Bearing Rigidity and Weight Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle wheel bearing apparatuses face challenges in simultaneously increasing rigidity and reducing weight, especially in limited spaces such as around vehicle suspensions, where traditional designs struggle to balance strength and durability under moment loads.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates double row ball bearings with a larger pitch circle diameter on the outer side and a smaller one on the inner side, along with ribs and conical recesses to enhance rigidity and reduce weight, and strategically positioned bolt apertures to optimize structural integrity and weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the size of the bearing apparatus is increased to increase rigidity, then bearing rigidity is improved, but the space required around the suspension increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing rigidityVSAvoidspace around suspension
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming ribs at specific locations on the wheel mounting flange and hub wheel where structural reinforcement is most needed. These ribs are positioned to maximize rigidity enhancement while occupying minimal additional space, allowing the bearing apparatus to achieve higher rigidity without increasing overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric design in the arrangement of ribs and recesses on the wheel mounting flange and hub wheel. The ribs are strategically positioned at specific radial and axial locations rather than being uniformly distributed, creating an asymmetric structure that optimizes rigidity in critical areas while maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Weight of moving object

If material is removed to reduce weight, then weight is decreased, but rigidity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of bearing apparatusVSAvoidrigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming ribs at specific locations on the wheel mounting flange and hub wheel where structural reinforcement is most needed. These ribs are positioned to maximize rigidity enhancement while occupying minimal additional space, allowing the bearing apparatus to achieve higher rigidity without increasing overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by varying the thickness, height, and positioning of ribs and recesses in the wheel mounting flange and hub wheel. By optimizing these geometric parameters, the design achieves maximum rigidity enhancement per unit of material added, effectively improving the strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If double row tapered roller bearings are used for heavy duty vehicles, then load capacity is improved, but rotation torque and fuel consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacityVSAvoidrotation torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the copying principle by adopting the successful design features from double row tapered roller bearings (such as the double row configuration and raceway geometry) but implementing them with ball bearings instead of roller elements. This allows the design to replicate the high load capacity characteristics while achieving lower rotation torque and improved fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by modifying the bearing element type from rollers to balls while maintaining the double row configuration. This parameter change fundamentally alters the friction characteristics and rotation torque requirements, enabling the bearing to handle heavy loads with significantly reduced rotational resistance and improved fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves a significant increase in bearing rigidity and extends bearing life while reducing weight by up to 33-37% in the outer member and 16-18% in the hub wheel, effectively addressing the antinomic goals of increased rigidity and reduced weight.

Implementation Method 1

double row ball bearings with a larger pitch circle diameter on the outer side and a smaller one on the inner side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling contact: Ball Bearing

Data Source

PatentEP2990216B1Bearing device for wheel
Publication Date: 2021.07.28 NTN CORP
  • EP2990216B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2990216B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2990216B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A bearing apparatus for a wheel of vehicle which can solve the antinomic problems of reducing the weight and of increasing the rigidity of the bearing apparatus is provided. According to the present invention there is provided a bearing apparatus for a wheel of vehicle comprising an outer member (2), an inner member (1) and double row groups of characterized in that a pitch circle diameter (PCDo) of the ball group of the outer side is larger than a pitch circle diameter (PCDi) of the ball group of the inner side, and that ribs (17) are formed on a surface of the inner side of the wheel mounting flange (6), each rib (17) being formed by an outline including straight portions (17a) radially extending outward from the base of the wheel mounting flange (6) and a rounded tip portion (17b) having a predetermined radius of curvature (r) centered on the axial center (0) of hub bolt (6a) and substantially corresponding to a distance between the axial center (O) and the outermost periphery of the wheel mounting flange (6).