Wheel Center Cap Assembly Adaptor Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wheel center caps for work vehicles are costly due to high material and assembly expenses, as they often require the same diameter as the wheel, making them impractical.

Innovation Solution

A wheel center cap assembly featuring a center cap attached to a hub via an adaptor with elastic retention mechanisms, such as snap fasteners, to ensure secure attachment without the need for screws or high material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the center cap is made with the same diameter as the wheel to cover the entire wheel, then the wheel appearance is fully covered and protected, but the material cost and assembly cost become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage area of center capVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel cover system is divided into multiple components: a hub cap that attaches to the wheel hub, an adaptor with flange portions that couples to the hub, and coupling members that secure the adaptor. This segmentation allows only the necessary central portion to be covered, reducing material usage while maintaining functional coverage of the hub area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts only the essential covering function to the hub area rather than covering the entire wheel. The hub cap and adaptor structure provides sufficient coverage for the wheel hub and center portion, eliminating the need for expensive full-wheel coverage while maintaining aesthetic and protective functions where most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If traditional screw-based attachment methods are used to secure the center cap to the hub, then the attachment is secure and reliable, but the assembly complexity and assembly cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidassembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment system is segmented into the adaptor with integrated flange portions and coupling members, separating the attachment function from the center cap body. This allows the cap to be a simple cosmetic cover while the adaptor handles all attachment functions, simplifying the overall assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling members and flange portions are designed to self-align and self-secure to the hub without requiring precise alignment procedures or complex fastening operations. The modular design allows for tool-free or simplified attachment, reducing assembly complexity while maintaining secure attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a unitary structure integrating the center cap and adaptor is used, then the number of parts is reduced and assembly is simplified, but the retention mechanism becomes less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of partsVSAvoidretention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The design segments the center cap and adaptor into separate components that attach through the snap fastener mechanism. This segmentation allows the retention portions to be optimally designed for secure attachment while maintaining ease of assembly. The separate cap can be easily attached and detached from the adaptor through the elastic retention mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The snap fastener mechanism utilizes elastic deformation parameter changes to achieve secure retention. The retention portions are designed with elastic properties that allow them to deform during attachment and then spring back to lock the cap securely to the adaptor, providing reliable retention without increasing part count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for easy attachment and secure retention of the center cap, reducing material costs and assembly complexity while maintaining a practical and cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

a retention portion provided in an inner face of the center cap being elastically retained to the uneven portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic retention: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the hub attachment portion including at least one retention piece to be elastically retained to a retention groove formed in the shaft member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic retention: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11648798B2Wheel center cap assembly
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 KUBOTA CORP
  • US11648798B2 patent drawing
  • US11648798B2 patent drawing
  • US11648798B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wheel center cap ASSY (assembly) for a work vehicle includes a center cap attached to a hub of a wheel coupled to an axle and having a center axis, an adaptor including a cap attachment portion to which the center cap is attached and a plurality of flange portions disposed on the outer side of and along a circumferential direction of the center cap, and a coupling member for coupling the flange portions to the hub.