Wheel Chock Extension Structure for Anti-Rollover Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wheel chocks and restraint systems are not sufficiently effective in preventing unauthorized or accidental vehicle movement, particularly in scenarios like trailer creep or on sloping surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A wheel chock with a longitudinal extension and a corresponding restraint system that includes a ground-anchored base plate with teeth elements for engagement with the wheel chock, enhancing resistance to vehicle movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a traditional wheel chock with a single base plate is used, then the structure is simple and easy to operate, but the resistance force against vehicle movement is insufficient, especially on sloping surfaces or in icy conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance forceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel chock is divided into a main body and one or more extension members that can be positioned at different locations. Each segment has its own teeth elements that engage with the base plate, distributing the resistance force across multiple engagement points rather than relying on a single base plate location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-plane engagement (one base plate location) to a multi-dimensional engagement system where extension members can be positioned at different longitudinal and lateral locations relative to the wheel, creating multiple engagement planes and increasing the overall resistance force through spatial distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the wheel chock uses a single engagement point with the base plate, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of preventing vehicle movement is insufficient under challenging conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in preventing vehicle movementVSAvoidnumber of engagement points
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The engagement system is segmented into multiple independent teeth elements distributed across the main body and extension members. Each tooth element provides independent engagement with the base plate, so that if one engagement point experiences reduced friction or ice, other engagement points continue to provide reliable resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the wheel chock (main body vs. extension members) have teeth elements positioned at different locations relative to the wheel and base plate. This local differentiation allows optimal engagement at each specific location, with some teeth elements better suited for high-friction conditions and others for low-friction icy conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Force

If the wheel chock is designed with extension members lying adjacent to the wheel tire side wall, then the horizontal resistance force is increased, but the ease of operation may be reduced due to additional positioning requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal resistance forceVSAvoidease of positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The extension members are designed to be movable relative to the main body, allowing them to be dynamically positioned adjacent to the wheel tire side wall during operation. This dynamic positioning capability enables the extension members to adapt to different wheel positions and sizes while maintaining the increased horizontal resistance force benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents vehicle movement by increasing the horizontal resistance force through the engagement of teeth elements, even in challenging conditions such as icy or snowy weather.

Implementation Method 1

the main body having a base comprising an underside with a first plurality of downwardly projecting teeth elements configured to releasably engage a corresponding ground-anchored retention plate having protrusions, such as ribs, ridges or the like, for engagement with the teeth elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

the main body having a sloped top wheel-facing side configured to receive in overlay and abutment the wheel tire... to resist movement of the wheel chock and vehicle wheel once the teeth are engaged on the retention plate and as the wheel tire applies pressure to the top wheel-facing side of the main body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

the at least one extension member being configured, in use, to lie adjacent to at least a portion of a side wall of the wheel tire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectContact pressure distribution: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP4253172B1Wheel chock with a longitudinal extension
Publication Date: 2025.02.19 9172 9863 QUEBEC
  • EP4253172B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4253172B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4253172B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The wheel chock (100) is designed to prevent a vehicle (104) from moving in an unauthorized or accidental manner. The wheel chock (100) includes a longitudinal extension (200) to further improve resistance to rollover and tipping when the wheel (102) is pressed forcefully against the wheel chock (100). The extension (200) includes a protruding portion (210) that can extend over a relatively long distance along the tire sidewall (126) and allows the wheel chock (100) to create a latching engagement between a tooth (160) and a blocking element (112) on the base plate (110) beyond the front end of its main body (150).