Wheel Cover Quick Mount Cam Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wheel covers for vehicles are complex to install and remove, require tools, obstruct hub visibility during maintenance, and have aerodynamic inefficiencies, leading to increased costs and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

A wheel cover system with a receiver and spring mechanism that allows for tool-free installation and removal, providing optimized aerodynamics and minimal parts, with a design that allows for quick installation and maintenance without obstructing hub access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional wheel covers are installed using lug nuts and studs, then the wheel cover can be securely attached, but the installation process requires tools and increases installation time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional threaded fastening system (lug nuts and studs) with a cam-actuated locking mechanism. The cam lever, when rotated, forces the wheel cover radially inward to engage locking lugs with recesses in the hub, providing secure attachment without requiring threaded fasteners or tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel cover system incorporates spring-loaded arms that automatically engage with the hub when the wheel cover is mounted. These springs provide continuous outward pressure to maintain engagement of the locking lugs, eliminating the need for manual adjustment or additional fastening operations during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional wheel covers are completely removed for hub inspection, then full hub visibility is achieved, but the maintenance process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance easeVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel cover system separates the wheel cover from the hub using a quick-release mechanism. The cam lever and locking lugs allow the wheel cover to be independently mounted or removed from the hub assembly, enabling maintenance personnel to access the hub by simply detaching the cover rather than removing entire wheel assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If conventional wheel covers include multiple components and materials, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing costs and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel cover strengthVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into unified components. The wheel cover body incorporates both the aerodynamic shell and the mounting interface with integrated locking lugs. The hub assembly combines the central hub structure with recesses designed to receive these lugs, eliminating the need for separate fasteners, gaskets, and mounting brackets required by conventional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables rapid, tool-free mounting of wheel covers with optimized aerodynamics, reducing installation time, maintenance complexity, and fuel costs, while maintaining unobstructed hub access for inspections.

Implementation Method 1

A spring has a first hook and a second hook. The first hook is engaged to the first post, and the second hook is engaged to the second post. The spring has a spring bias configured to generate an outward force in the outward direction away from the hub at a spring engagement point.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring bias: Spring

Implementation Method 2

An inward force exerted against a wheel cover of the wheel cover assembly in an inward direction towards the hub is received. The inward force overcomes a spring bias of a spring of the receiver and translates the wheel cover assembly in the inward direction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce: Force

Data Source

PatentEP3571063B1Wheel cover quick mount
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 MOOCHOUT
  • EP3571063B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3571063B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3571063B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

Implementations disclosed and claimed herein provide a wheel cover system. In one implementation, an inward force exerted against a wheel cover of the wheel cover assembly in an inward direction towards the hub is received. The inward force overcomes a spring bias of a spring of the receiver and translates the wheel cover assembly in the inward direction. A first rotational force rotating the wheel cover assembly in a first direction is received. The first post guides and engages the first hook, and the second post guides and engages the second hook during rotation. A first positive feedback is generated in response to the inward force and the first rotational force. The wheel cover assembly is releaseably locked to the receiver by translating the wheel cover assembly in the outward direction using an outward force generated by the spring bias. The outward force provides a second positive feedback.