Wheel-End Tire Pressure Management With Sensor-Driven Air Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pressurized containers face issues such as slow or fast leakage, physical wear, and environmental wear, lacking reliable methods for pressure management, especially in applications like automotive and aerospace where pressure changes are rapid.

Innovation Solution

An automatic pressure management system that includes a housing unit, a pressurized fluid source, and a power interface, with sensors and a control system to dynamically control pressure within containers by compressing or releasing air, allowing for centralized power integration and independent operation at each wheel end, reducing system complexity and enabling efficient pressure maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional pressure management methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but pressure control reliability deteriorates due to leakage and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides pressure management into independent wheel-end units, each with its own pump and control system. This segmentation allows each unit to manage pressure independently, improving reliability by isolating failures to individual wheels rather than the entire system, while the modular nature keeps each segment relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Pressure sensors continuously monitor tire pressure and provide feedback to control systems, which automatically adjust pump operation to maintain target pressure ranges. This closed-loop feedback mechanism significantly improves pressure control reliability by dynamically compensating for leakage and wear without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If centralized power integration is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to power interface requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidpower interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power interface is designed to provide multiple functions: electrical power delivery to wheel-end units, rotational power transmission through the rotor-stator mechanism, and potentially data communication. This multi-functionality consolidates several systems into one interface, improving ease of operation while the integrated design actually reduces overall complexity rather than increasing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotary joint with rotor and stator components acts as an intermediary mechanism that enables power and control signal transfer between the stationary housing and rotating wheel-end components. This intermediary solution resolves the complexity of providing powered operation to rotating elements without requiring complex mechanical linkages or flexible cables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If dynamic pressure control is implemented, then pressure management effectiveness is improved, but loss of energy increases due to continuous pump operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure management effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The pump operates periodically rather than continuously, activating only when pressure sensors detect that tire pressure has dropped below the target range. The control system monitors pressure levels and cycles pump operation accordingly, maintaining effective pressure management while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by using the pump only when necessary to correct pressure deviations, rather than maintaining constant pressure through continuous operation. This approach achieves sufficient pressure management effectiveness by intervening only when pressure falls outside acceptable ranges, thereby minimizing energy waste during normal operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively manages pressure within pressurized containers by reducing leakage, wear, and environmental impacts, providing reliable pressure control and simplifying installation and operation, especially in dynamic environments like vehicles and aerospace.

Implementation Method 1

The pump can be configured to compress air into the pressurized reservoir

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

The system can selectively release pressurized air from the pressurized reservoir

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure release: Depressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS12059930B1System and method for automatic pressure management
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 APERIA TECH
  • US12059930B1 patent drawing
  • US12059930B1 patent drawing
  • US12059930B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure management system for a tire assembly on a vehicle including: a housing unit, a pump, and a power interface.