Wheel-Legged Robot Somersault Control for Obstacle Crossing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots, particularly wheel-legged robots, lack a suitable motion mode to navigate obstacles such as holes, ditches, or rivers, as their forward motion cannot avoid these obstacles effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for controlling a robot to perform a somersault motion, adjusting the center of mass of the wheel-leg portion relative to the base portion through joint torque control, allowing the robot to jump over obstacles by performing a somersault.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the robot uses forward motion to navigate, then the motion control is simple and straightforward, but the robot cannot avoid obstacles such as holes, ditches, or rivers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance capabilityVSAvoidmotion mode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot dynamically switches between different motion modes (forward motion, somersault motion, landing motion) based on obstacle detection. The control system adjusts the motion strategy in real-time, transitioning from simple forward motion to complex somersault motion when obstacles are detected, and back to forward motion after clearing the obstacle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot changes its center of mass position parameters during the somersault motion. By adjusting the relative positions of the wheel-leg portion and base portion centers of mass across different phases (takeoff, flight, landing), the robot achieves the necessary rotational and translational motion to clear obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the robot performs somersault motion to cross obstacles, then the obstacle crossing capability is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle crossing capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The somersault motion is segmented into three distinct phases: takeoff phase, flight phase, and landing phase. Each phase has specific control requirements and center of mass positioning strategies. This segmentation simplifies the control problem by breaking down the complex somersault motion into manageable stages with clear objectives for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs preliminary actions to prepare for the somersault motion, including detecting obstacles in advance, planning the motion trajectory, and positioning the center of mass appropriately before initiating the takeoff phase. This preliminary preparation reduces the complexity during the actual execution of the somersault.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the center of mass of the wheel-leg portion is kept low for stability, then the robot is more stable during forward motion, but the robot cannot perform effective somersault motion to clear obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforward motion stabilityVSAvoidsomersault motion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robot dynamically adjusts its center of mass position based on the motion phase. During forward motion, the center of mass is positioned low for stability. During somersault motion, the center of mass position is adjusted relative to the base portion to enable effective rotation and clearing of obstacles. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between stability and somersault capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the robot to successfully navigate obstacles by performing a somersault motion, enhancing its motion ability and obstacle avoidance capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

controlling a torque of the at least one joint according to the motion instruction to allow the robot to perform the somersault motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque control: Torque

Implementation Method 2

in a takeoff phase of the somersault motion, a center of mass of the wheel-leg portion being lower than a center of mass of the base portion; in a flight phase of the somersault motion, there being a time at which the center of mass of the wheel-leg portion is higher than the center of mass of the base portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCenter of mass positioning: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12533811B2Method and apparatus for control robot to perform somersault motion, and robot
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US12533811B2 patent drawing
  • US12533811B2 patent drawing
  • US12533811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a robot to perform a somersault motion enables the robot, when facing an obstacle such as a hole, ditch, or ravine, to cross the obstacle by performing a somersault motion. The robot includes a wheel-leg portion and a base portion connected via a joint. The robot receives a motion instruction and controls a torque of the joint to allow the robot to perform the somersault. During a takeoff phase of the somersault, a center of mass of the wheel-leg portion is lower than a center of mass of the base portion. During a flight phase, the center of mass of the wheel-leg portion is higher than the center of mass of the base portion at some point in time. During the landing phase, the center of mass of the wheel-leg portion is lower than the base portion. This can enable the robot to avoid obstacles.