Low Gravity All-Surface Vehicle Wheel Motor Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ground and amphibious vehicles face limitations in cornering at high speeds and climbing large objects due to a high center of gravity, and single-wheel designs are prone to spinning issues during acceleration.

Innovation Solution

The design relocates the majority of the vehicle's weight, including engines and electronics, inside and below the wheels, using multiple wheels with axles in a configuration that allows independent pivoting, maintaining a low center of gravity and preventing high-centering, enabling rapid acceleration and high-speed cornering while allowing the vehicle to climb large objects and traverse water.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the center of gravity is positioned high above the wheels to accommodate engine and component space, then the vehicle structure is simplified and easier to manufacture, but the vehicle becomes unstable during cornering and prone to flipping over

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle structure simplicityVSAvoidcornering stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent relocates the center of gravity from a high position above the wheels to a low position near the ground, fundamentally changing the vertical dimension of weight distribution. This dimensional shift in mass placement resolves the contradiction by achieving both structural simplicity and cornering stability through the low center of gravity design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the center of gravity is lowered close to the ground to improve cornering stability, then the vehicle can corner at high speeds, but the vehicle cannot climb over objects of even the smallest size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecornering stabilityVSAvoidobstacle climbing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the vehicle into segmented functional units: multiple independent wheel assemblies that can be positioned at different locations. This segmentation allows the vehicle to maintain a low center of gravity for cornering stability while the distributed wheel configuration enables climbing capability over obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple wheels positioned at different horizontal locations rather than a single low center of gravity point, adding horizontal dimensionality to the weight distribution strategy. This resolves the contradiction by achieving both cornering stability and obstacle climbing through spatial distribution of wheels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If a single large wheel is used to achieve high clearance and low center of gravity, then the vehicle structure is simplified, but the motorized portion spins off-axis during acceleration preventing operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel configuration simplicityVSAvoidacceleration reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single wheel into multiple wheels (at least two), distributing the propulsion function across multiple independent wheel assemblies. This segmentation prevents the motorized portion from spinning off-axis during acceleration while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple wheel assemblies into a unified vehicle platform, where each wheel functions as an independent propulsion unit. This merging of multiple functional wheels resolves the reliability issue during acceleration while preserving the simplicity of the overall vehicle structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If multiple wheels are used to prevent motor spinning off-axis, then acceleration reliability is improved, but the vehicle complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration reliabilityVSAvoidwheel configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the propulsion system into multiple independent wheel assemblies, each capable of independent rotation and propulsion. This segmentation improves acceleration reliability while the modular nature of the segments keeps the overall system manageable in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each wheel assembly functions as a self-contained propulsion unit with its own motor and drive mechanism. This self-service capability of each wheel module improves reliability during acceleration while avoiding the need for complex inter-wheel mechanical linkages, thereby controlling overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3126173B1Low gravity all-surface vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.12.16 PAHA DESIGNS LLC
  • EP3126173B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3126173B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3126173B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Vehicles are disclosed which have a lower center of gravity than existing all-terrain, amphibious, and unmanned ground vehicles due to the location of propulsion units and other vehicle components inside the wheels of the vehicle. The vehicles can climb over large obstacles yet are also able to corner at high speeds. The vehicles can be configured for direct manual operation or operation by remote control, and can also be configured for a wide variety of missions.