Dead Reckoning Wheel Navigation for Infrastructure-Free Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for tracking the position of wheeled objects in large areas are either expensive, require extensive infrastructure, or are prone to errors due to signal interference and satellite blockages, making them inefficient for applications like retail store inventory management and theft prevention.

Innovation Solution

A navigation system using dead reckoning methods, where the position of a wheeled object is determined by measuring its heading and wheel rotation, with error correction and communication with external markers, allowing for autonomous operation and activation of anti-theft systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If GPS or RF tag systems are used to determine position, then position tracking capability is provided, but system cost and infrastructure complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition tracking capabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic/GPS-based position tracking systems with a mechanical dead reckoning system that uses wheel rotation sensors and heading sensors to calculate position. This substitution eliminates the need for complex infrastructure like GPS satellites or RF transmitters/receivers, while providing reliable position tracking through mechanical measurement of distance traveled and direction oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The navigation system is self-contained within the wheeled object itself, requiring no external infrastructure. The system uses onboard sensors (wheel rotation sensor, heading sensor) and internal processing to autonomously determine its own position through dead reckoning, making the system independent and eliminating infrastructure complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Area of stationary object

If GPS or RF systems are deployed in large tracking areas, then coverage is improved, but system cost and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking area coverageVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces area-wide electronic infrastructure (GPS coverage or RF transmitter networks) with a self-contained mechanical navigation system that works anywhere the wheeled object can physically move. The system calculates position relative to its starting point using only onboard sensors, eliminating the need for area-wide infrastructure installation regardless of tracking area size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the position tracking capability from the environment and places it entirely within the wheeled object itself. By removing dependence on external infrastructure and embedding all necessary sensing and calculation functions in the moving object, the system achieves universal area coverage without any installation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If RF tag systems are used in environments with signal attenuation structures, then position monitoring is enabled, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to signal blockage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition monitoring capabilityVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electromagnetic signal-based position monitoring with a mechanical dead reckoning system that measures wheel rotation and heading directly. This mechanical approach is immune to signal attenuation from walls, buildings, or other structures, as it relies on physical measurements of distance and direction rather than electromagnetic signals that can be blocked or reflected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a reliable, cost-effective means to track wheeled objects, reducing theft and improving inventory management by accurately determining their position and movement within a tracking area, even in complex environments.

Implementation Method 1

the heading is determined with reference to the Earth's magnetic field by disposing magnetic sensors in or on the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field sensing: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

A navigation system uses a dead reckoning method to estimate an object's present position relative to one or more prior positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDead reckoning:

Data Source

PatentUS8751148B2Navigation systems and methods for wheeled objects
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 GATEKEEPER SYST INC
  • US8751148B2 patent drawing
  • US8751148B2 patent drawing
  • US8751148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A navigation system uses a dead reckoning method to estimate an object's present position relative to one or more prior positions. In some embodiments, the dead reckoning method determines a change in position from the object's heading and speed during an elapsed time interval. In embodiments suitable for use with wheeled objects, the dead reckoning method determines the change in position by measuring the heading and the amount of wheel rotation. Some or all of the components of the navigation system may be disposed within a wheel, such as a wheel of a shopping cart.