Whip Shaft Planar Fin Flapper Anti-Twist Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing riding crops or whips face issues with the flapper twisting around the shaft during use, leading to an insecure and uncomfortable grip, and the impact force is not evenly distributed due to the cylindrical shape of the shaft.

Innovation Solution

A whip design featuring a shaft with a planar fin at the end, sheathed with a flapper, where the fin is securely attached to prevent twisting, providing a broader base for the flapper to spread the impact force and ensuring a cushioned yet secure grip.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the flapper is loosely fitted over the cylindrical shaft, then the grip is comfortable, but the flapper twists during use and becomes insecure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip comfortVSAvoidflapper security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a planar fin at the end of the shaft, transforming the symmetric cylindrical shape into an asymmetric structure. The flapper is fitted over this finned end, creating an asymmetric fit that prevents twisting while maintaining comfort. The fin acts as a stabilizing element that stops the flapper from rotating around the shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a dimensional element by introducing a planar fin that extends radially from the cylindrical shaft. This transforms the one-dimensional cylindrical surface into a two-dimensional structure with radial extension, providing a broader base for the flapper and preventing twisting through the added geometric dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the shaft is cylindrical, then the structure is simple, but the impact force is not evenly distributed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaft structureVSAvoidimpact force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding the fin only at the specific location where impact occurs (the end of the shaft), rather than changing the entire shaft structure. This localized modification provides even force distribution at the impact point while maintaining the simplicity of the cylindrical shaft elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By adding the planar fin that extends radially from the cylindrical shaft, the patent introduces an additional dimension to the structure. This transforms the impact surface from a one-dimensional cylindrical edge to a two-dimensional area, allowing impact force to be distributed across a broader base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the flapper is tightly fitted to prevent twisting, then security is improved, but comfort is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflapper securityVSAvoidgrip comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric fin structure provides mechanical prevention of twisting without requiring tight fitting. The fin acts as a physical stop that prevents rotation, allowing the flapper to be fitted loosely for comfort while still maintaining security against twisting through the asymmetric geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS7721944B2Whip
Publication Date: 2010.05.25 PATTON ROBERT
  • US7721944B2 patent drawing
  • US7721944B2 patent drawing
  • US7721944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A whip comprising a shaft having a first and second end, the shaft being arranged to provide a handle at the first end and a flapper located at the second end. The shaft comprises at least one planar fin located at the second end of the shaft, the fin being at least partially sheathed with the flapper.