Whitelist Component Selective Content Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content sites lack the ability to selectively restrict access to specific content, forcing entities to block access entirely, which is not a feasible solution for entities wanting to limit access to objectionable content while allowing access to relevant content.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a whitelist component to generate and manage tokens, allowing entities to restrict access to a subset of content, enabling users to access only the content items identified on the whitelist associated with the token, thereby controlling access through a user interface in whitelist restricted mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If entities block access to the content site entirely, then access to objectionable content is restricted, but access to relevant content is also blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to objectionable contentVSAvoidaccess to relevant content
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The content library is segmented into whitelisted content (approved content) and non-whitelisted content (objectionable content). The system divides the content access control into two distinct paths: users with tokens can access whitelisted content, while users without tokens are blocked from non-whitelisted content. This segmentation allows selective access control rather than a blanket block.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels of access are provided to different content items. Whitelisted content items have full access quality for authenticated users, while non-whitelisted content items have restricted or blocked quality. The system applies different access policies locally to different content items based on their whitelisting status, rather than applying a uniform block to all content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If entities implement selective content restriction, then access to objectionable content is limited, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to objectionable contentVSAvoidcontent access control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A token serves as an intermediary credential between the user and the content library. Instead of implementing complex user profiles, authorization matrices, or content tagging systems, the invention uses a simple token-based intermediary that mediates access control. The token carrying component and whitelist component work together to automatically determine access rights without complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Content items are pre-processed and tagged with whitelist status before being made available in the library. The whitelist component maintains a pre-generated list of approved content items. This preliminary classification of content into whitelisted and non-whitelisted categories enables simple real-time access control without complex analysis during user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If entities allow unrestricted access to the content site, then all content is accessible, but objectionable content can be viewed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to all contentVSAvoidaccess to objectionable content
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The access control system transitions from a static all-or-nothing model to a dynamic model where access rights change based on user authentication state. Users without tokens face restricted access to non-whitelisted content, while users with valid tokens gain dynamic access to whitelisted content. The system adapts access policies in real-time based on token validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates objectionable content items from the content library by removing them from the whitelisted set. Instead of filtering objectionable content during delivery, the invention extracts and isolates approved content into a whitelist, making the presence of objectionable content implicit through what is included rather than what is excluded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8793806B1Systems and methods to selectively limit access only to a subset of content, identified in a whitelist, of a library of content
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8793806B1 patent drawing
  • US8793806B1 patent drawing
  • US8793806B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to generating whitelists respectively identifying subsets of content from a library of content, maintaining respective associations between tokens and the whitelists, and selectively limiting access only to the subsets of content identified in whitelists based upon one or more tokens included in a request for access to the library of content.