Wide-Angle Impedance Matching for Dual-Polarized Array Antennas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active impedance stabilization of radiating elements in array antennas is challenging, especially at off-axis angles, due to mutual coupling and limitations in existing wide-angle impedance-matching devices, which affect beam formation and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A wide-angle impedance-matching device comprising a transmission screen and orthogonal metal pins positioned at anti-symmetry planes to independently match impedance for H and E-plane scans, allowing for dual linear polarization and improved angular sector coverage without using dielectric materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional impedance-matching device is used, then impedance matching is achieved at boresight, but active impedance becomes unstable at off-axis angles due to mutual coupling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive impedance stabilityVSAvoidangular sector coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance-matching device is segmented into multiple independent matching networks, each designed to handle specific angular sectors. This allows the system to maintain impedance stability across wide off-axis angles by activating appropriate segments based on beam direction, resolving the contradiction between impedance reliability and angular adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs dynamic impedance matching where the matching network characteristics are adjusted according to the beam steering angle. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain optimal impedance matching across the entire angular sector, simultaneously achieving both impedance stability and wide angular coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If the unit cell size is increased to minimize the number of radiating elements, then manufacturing cost decreases, but grating lobes appear due to periodicity effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidgrating lobe suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The unit cell design incorporates asymmetric elements and non-uniform spacing patterns that disrupt the periodicity responsible for grating lobes. This asymmetric configuration allows larger unit cell dimensions while suppressing grating lobe formation, thereby reducing the number of elements needed while maintaining beam quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The impedance-matching device is designed with pre-calculated compensation characteristics that anticipate and counteract grating lobe effects before they manifest. This preliminary design approach allows the use of larger unit cells without suffering from grating lobe issues, reducing manufacturing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If small radiating elements are used to avoid grating lobes, then grating lobe suppression is maintained, but mutual coupling between elements increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating lobe suppressionVSAvoidmutual coupling effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance-matching device acts as an intermediary between the closely-spaced radiating elements, providing isolation and decoupling networks that reduce mutual coupling effects. This allows small element spacing for grating lobe suppression while the matching device mediates the strong coupling interactions between adjacent elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If existing WAIM devices are used to compensate mutual coupling, then impedance matching improves, but the devices are bulky and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance matchingVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance-matching device utilizes thin-film and planar structures instead of bulky three-dimensional components. This thin-film approach achieves effective impedance matching and mutual coupling compensation while maintaining a compact, low-profile device structure that reduces overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs parameter optimization techniques where geometric dimensions, material properties, and configuration parameters are precisely tuned to achieve effective impedance matching with minimal structural complexity. This parameter-based design allows compact implementation of WAIM functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240213664A1Wide-angle impedance-matching device for radiating-element array antenna and method of designing such a device
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 THALES SA
  • US20240213664A1 patent drawing
  • US20240213664A1 patent drawing
  • US20240213664A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wide-angle impedance-matching device for a radiating-element array antenna includes a transmission screen having a first surface intended to be positioned facing the radiating-element array parallel to the radiating aperture of the antenna and being configured to match the impedance of the antenna for an H-plane scan, and a set of metal pins placed orthogonally, on at least one surface of the transmission screen, at the intersection of at least some of the respective anti-symmetry planes of the electric field radiated by the antenna for an H-plane scan, for two linear polarizations in two orthogonal directions, the set of metal pins being configured to match the impedance of the antenna for an E-plane scan.