Wide Concrete Slab Edge Reinforcement for Lower Carbon Floors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wide slab concrete floors face issues with edge load stresses and carbon emissions due to increased thickness requirements, which exacerbate structural weaknesses and contribute significantly to global warming.

Innovation Solution

Reinforcing bars (rebar) are placed only around the periphery of the slab, specifically within the edge region, reducing the overall thickness and concrete volume while maintaining strength, particularly at the edges and corners, using steel fibers and optimized rebar placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of concrete slab is increased to provide sufficient strength at edges and corners, then the load-bearing capacity is improved, but the concrete volume and carbon footprint increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacity at edgesVSAvoidconcrete volume
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing rebar only in the edge region (within 3 feet of slab edges) rather than uniformly throughout the entire slab. This concentrates reinforcement where load stresses are highest (edges and corners) while reducing concrete volume in the interior region, thereby maintaining strength where needed while minimizing overall concrete quantity and associated carbon emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the slab into two distinct regions: an edge region requiring reinforcement and an interior region that can be thinner. By dividing the slab thickness into a first thickness at edges and a second, lesser thickness in the interior, the design optimizes concrete usage while maintaining structural integrity where loads are applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the thickness of concrete slab is increased uniformly throughout, then the overall strength is improved, but the shrinkage restraint increases causing detrimental cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall slab strengthVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the slab thickness locally - thicker at edges where strength is needed and thinner in the interior. This localized thickness variation reduces uniform restraint on shrinkage across the entire slab, thereby minimizing the development of detrimental cracks while still providing sufficient strength at the edge regions where loads are applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of repair

If the joint spacing is increased to reduce the number of joints, then the maintenance requirements are reduced, but the risk of cracks developing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance requirementsVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials by combining conventional concrete with steel reinforcement (rebar) and steel fibers. This composite construction enhances the crack resistance of wide slabs with increased joint spacing, allowing larger slab areas between joints while maintaining reliability through the synergistic properties of the composite material system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating rebar placement in the edge region where cracks are most likely to initiate and propagate. This localized reinforcement strategy effectively addresses crack resistance in the most vulnerable areas, enabling increased joint spacing while maintaining overall slab reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Quantity of substance

If rebar is placed only in the edge region rather than uniformly throughout the slab, then the concrete volume is reduced, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcrete volumeVSAvoidrebar placement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating rebar placement in the edge region within 3 feet of slab edges. This focused reinforcement approach reduces the total quantity of rebar and concrete required compared to uniform reinforcement, while the simplified geometric pattern (perimeter-based placement) actually reduces manufacturing complexity compared to complex reinforcement patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12523036B2Wide slab concrete floor with reduced carbon footprint and method of manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 CONCRETE FIBER SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US12523036B2 patent drawing
  • US12523036B2 patent drawing
  • US12523036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ground-supported concrete slab has a reduced concrete requirement and, in turn, a reduced carbon footprint, while still capable of supporting a desired maximum load. The slab is polygonal in shape, with at least one of its sides being at least fifty feet in length. Each side of the slab is adjacent a corresponding joint. The slab has an edge region, consisting of the portion of the slab disposed within three feet of any joint. Rebar is disposed only within the edge region of the slab. Rebar is preferably placed to form two differently sized, concentric polygons that coincide in shape with the polygonal shape of the slab. The polygons may all be square. The concrete may further include steel fibers distributed throughout the concrete. The slab is formed by providing a suitable form, placing the rebar appropriately, and filling the form with concrete to a desired thickness.