Wi-Fi Direct Group Owner Selection via Network Capability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Wi-Fi Direct communication technologies face inefficiencies in determining a group owner, leading to suboptimal network connections, as the selection is based on random group owner intent values rather than network information.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where devices determine a group owner by comparing network information regarding internet access ability, allowing for dynamic adjustment of group owner intent values based on specific network situations, ensuring efficient network management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If group owner intent values are compared to determine group owner, then devices can establish connection, but the network connection efficiency is poor due to random selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection establishmentVSAvoidnetwork connection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for group owner determination from random intent values to network capability parameters (internet access ability). Devices compare their network information parameters, and the device with better network capability (e.g., internet access ability) is selected as group owner. This parameter change transforms the random selection process into a capability-based selection, improving network connection efficiency while maintaining reliable connection establishment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If preset random group owner intent values are used, then the determination process is simple, but it cannot adapt to specific network situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination process simplicityVSAvoidnetwork situation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing devices to share and compare their current network information (internet access ability, network type, etc.) during the group owner determination process. Instead of using static random values, devices dynamically assess their network capabilities and adjust their group owner intent accordingly. The device with superior network situation adapts to become group owner, making the system adaptable to specific network environments while maintaining a relatively simple determination process through automated comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If network information comparison is implemented for group owner determination, then connection efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection efficiencyVSAvoiddetermination mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where devices exchange network information (internet access ability, network type, etc.) with each other during the connection process. Each device receives feedback about the other's network capabilities and uses this information to determine the optimal group owner. This feedback loop enables efficient connection by ensuring the device with better network situation becomes group owner, while the complexity is managed through structured information exchange protocols rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9999080B2Device and method for performing device-to-device communication
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US9999080B2 patent drawing
  • US9999080B2 patent drawing
  • US9999080B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method for performing device-to-device communication by a first device according to the present invention comprises: a step of searching a second device that supports device-to-device communication; a step of receiving, from the found second device, second network information including information on whether or not the second device may access the Internet; and a step of determining either the first device or the second device as a group owner based on a first network information including on whether or not the first device may access the Internet and the second network information on the second device. The first device determines the second device as a group owner when the first network information indicates that the first device may not access the Internet.