Wi-Fi 7 Multi-Link AP Selection Using Active-Link Path Costs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Wi-Fi technologies, such as Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E, limit connectivity to a single band at a time, leading to inefficiencies in network throughput, latency, and reliability, while traditional RSSI-based assessment methods are inadequate for selecting the best access point (AP) in Wi-Fi 7 multi-link devices (MLDs) due to multiple links and varying channel conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method for Wi-Fi 7 MLDs to determine active links, obtain physical and MAC information, calculate path costs based on RSSI, MAC, and load metrics to select the best AP, optimizing channel scanning and discovery processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional RSSI-based assessment methods are used for AP selection, then the selection process is simple, but the accuracy is inadequate for Wi-Fi 7 multi-link devices due to multiple links and varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAP selection accuracyVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter set from traditional single-RSSI measurement to multiple parameters including RSSI, MAC layer metrics (frame transmission success rate, retransmission count), and load metrics (channel utilization, BSS load). This multi-parameter approach enables accurate AP selection in Wi-Fi 7 MLDs by capturing the complex interactions across multiple links and frequency bands, directly resolving the contradiction between selection accuracy and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a path cost calculation mechanism as an intermediary that integrates multiple assessment parameters into a unified selection metric. The path cost formula combines RSSI, MAC layer performance metrics, and load metrics with adjustable weights, serving as a mediator that translates complex multi-link conditions into a comparable selection criterion, thereby achieving accurate AP selection without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If channel scanning covers all links and channels thoroughly, then AP selection accuracy is improved, but scanning time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAP selection accuracyVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing channel scanning and RSSI measurement only on active links (links with established connections or recent activity) rather than all possible links. The system maintains a list of active links from previous associations or handovers and prioritizes scanning those first, reducing the overall scanning scope while maintaining selection accuracy for the current operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selectively measuring and evaluating only the most relevant parameters for each link rather than comprehensively analyzing all possible link characteristics. The system measures RSSI, MAC layer metrics, and load metrics only for active links and uses these partial measurements to calculate path costs, achieving sufficient accuracy without the time cost of exhaustive scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If Wi-Fi 7 MLDs operate on multiple links simultaneously, then network throughput and reliability are improved, but the complexity of managing multiple links and selecting optimal AP increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoidmulti-link management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-link management task into independent per-link assessments. Each link is evaluated separately using the same set of metrics (RSSI, MAC layer performance, load metrics), and the results are aggregated through the path cost calculation. This segmentation allows the system to manage multiple links systematically without overwhelming complexity, as each link is processed independently using standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal AP selection mechanism that works across all links and frequency bands using a unified path cost calculation framework. The same assessment metrics and selection algorithm are applied consistently to all active links, whether they operate on 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, or 6 GHz bands. This universal approach simplifies multi-link management by providing a single, consistent decision-making process that handles diversity in link characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260032575A1Selection of access point multi-link device
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US20260032575A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032575A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032575A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In implementations of the present disclosure, a solution for selecting an access point (AP) among a plurality of candidate APs is provided. A station (STA) MLD determines active links of a plurality of AP MLDs, and obtains physical information and media access control (MAC) information of the active links based on scanning the active links. The STA MLD further determines a plurality of received signal strength indicators (RSSIs) of the active links for a period of time, and determines a plurality of path costs for the active links based on the plurality of RSSIs, the physical information, and the MAC information. Then, the STA MLD selects an AP MLD from the plurality of AP MLDs based on the plurality of path costs. In this way, the AP MLD quality assessment approach and the evaluation model can be enhanced.