Wild Animal Crossing Control System Using Speed-Based Transit Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for detecting and signaling animal crossings on public roads often fail to prevent collisions between vehicles and wild animals, as drivers may not notice animals in time, leading to potential accidents and disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A method that monitors both the pathway and road proximity to detect wild animals and vehicles, allowing animal transit only if no vehicle is present or if the vehicle is traveling below a predetermined speed, using sensors and signaling systems to manage the crossing and prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If detection and signaling systems are implemented to alert drivers of animal crossings, then driver awareness of animal presence is improved, but collision prevention remains ineffective because drivers may not notice or respond in time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver awareness of animal presenceVSAvoidcollision prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of alerting drivers to animal presence and hoping they respond, the system inverts the approach by actively preventing animal crossing when vehicles are present or moving too quickly. The control unit prohibits transit by activating acoustic dissuaders or physical barriers, shifting control from driver reaction to automated prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary control unit that mediates between animal presence detection and actual crossing permission. This intermediary layer processes vehicle presence and speed information to make the final decision on whether to allow transit, rather than relying directly on driver response to signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If animal transit is allowed continuously to maintain natural ecosystem, then animal movement freedom is preserved, but collision risk with vehicles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal movement freedomVSAvoidcollision risk with vehicles
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts animal transit permission based on real-time conditions. Rather than a fixed allow/deny rule, the control unit continuously monitors vehicle presence and speed, adjusting the transit state accordingly - allowing crossing when safe, prohibiting when dangerous, thereby adapting to changing conditions to balance ecosystem needs with safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where vehicle detection and speed measurement continuously inform transit permission decisions. The control unit receives feedback from sensors about current road conditions and adjusts animal transit control accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that responds to actual conditions rather than operating on fixed rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If vehicle speed monitoring and prohibition systems are implemented, then collision prevention is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it detects animal presence, monitors vehicle presence and speed, decides on transit permission, and activates dissuaders or barriers. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the system reduces overall complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical speed enforcement mechanisms with electronic sensors and software-based speed monitoring. Instead of physical speed gates or mechanical barriers that require complex actuation, the system uses optical or electromagnetic sensors to detect vehicle speed and uses software logic to control transit permission and activate dissuaders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively regulates wild animal transit across public roads, ensuring driver and animal safety while maintaining natural ecosystems by using sensors and signaling systems to manage speed and prevent collisions.

Implementation Method 1

The steps of monitoring a portion of the public road and the pathway in proximity of the crossing are carried out by volumetric sensor means, preferably of an infrared type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

The step of prohibiting transit of the wild animal detected in proximity of the crossing is carried out by means of acoustic dissuaders located at the portion of the pathway in proximity of the crossing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic radiation pressure: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Data Source

PatentEP3304519B1A method for regulating a transit of wild animals along a crossing pathway of a public road
Publication Date: 2019.01.09 DIGITALBIRD DI BUTTIERI MICHELE
  • EP3304519B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The method for regulating a transit of wild animals along a crossing pathway of a public road, the pathway being habitually used by wild animals and meeting the public road (1) at a crossing (3), comprises following steps: a) monitoring a portion (20) of the pathway (2) in proximity of the crossing (3), for detecting presence of a wild animal (4) in proximity of the crossing (3); b) monitoring a portion (10) of the public road (1) in proximity of the crossing (3), for detecting a presence of at least a vehicle (5) in proximity of the crossing (3) and a velocity (V) thereof; c) allowing transit of the wild animal (4) detected on the crossing (3) if a vehicle (5) presence is not detected in proximity of the crossing (3) or alternatively if a presence of a vehicle (5) is detected in proximity of the crossing (3) travelling at a velocity (V) that is lower than a predetermined limit value (V*); d) prohibiting transit of the wild animal (4) detected in proximity of the crossing (3) if a presence is detected of a vehicle (5) in proximity of the crossing (3) having a velocity (V) of higher than the predetermined limit value (V*).