Wildfire Emissions Quantification Method for Carbon Markets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a simple and widely applicable way to quantify wildfire-related emissions reductions for certification on carbon markets, discouraging investment in wildfire fighting systems due to complexity and lack of transparency.

Innovation Solution

A method using objective, widely accepted data from satellite monitoring and databases like GFED and CAMS to calculate emissions reductions, with four practical examples for deriving baseline emissions, ensuring transparency and expeditious application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex quantification methods like Verra are used to ensure scientific accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions reduction quantification accuracyVSAvoidquantification method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex quantification process into distinct modules: (1) baseline emissions determination using four practical examples, (2) actual emissions measurement using satellite data, (3) reduction calculation, and (4) certification procedures. This segmentation makes the overall system more manageable and applicable while maintaining scientific rigor through standardized protocols for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces satellite monitoring data as an intermediary tool that objectively measures actual emissions without requiring direct involvement in complex ground-based monitoring systems. This intermediary approach simplifies the quantification process while maintaining measurement precision through remotely sensed data from established satellite programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If complex quantification methods with detailed recalibration are used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions reduction quantification accuracyVSAvoidtime for model recalibration and data collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes baseline emissions levels through four practical examples that can be determined in advance using historical data and standardized methods. This preliminary action allows entities to have a pre-established reference point for comparing actual emissions, eliminating the need for time-consuming recalibration when quantifying emissions reductions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses satellite monitoring data that copies or replicates ground-based emissions measurements from multiple sources simultaneously. This copying approach provides comprehensive emissions data without requiring physical presence or recalibration of local monitoring equipment, significantly reducing the time required for data collection while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If simple quantification methods are used to reduce complexity and time, then ease of operation and productivity are improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpedition of emissions reduction certificationVSAvoidemissions reduction quantification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal quantification framework that can be applied across different jurisdictions, ecosystems, and emission sources using the same four practical examples for baseline determination and satellite data for actual measurements. This universality enables expedited certification through consistent application of proven methods while maintaining measurement precision through standardized protocols validated across multiple contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from ground-based direct observations to satellite-remote sensing parameters, which provide comparable precision through different physical measurement approaches. This parameter change enables broader spatial coverage and faster data acquisition while maintaining scientific accuracy through established satellite retrieval algorithms for emissions monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If transparent and simple methods are used to attract investment, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of scientific basis deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of quantification methodVSAvoidscientific foundation of emissions reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables entities to self-determine their baseline emissions using the four practical examples and self-measure actual emissions through publicly available satellite data. This self-service approach simplifies operation by eliminating complex third-party verification requirements while maintaining scientific reliability through transparent, documented methodologies that can be independently validated using the same standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230360060A1Expedited Method of Quantifying Reduction of Wildfire Related Emissions to Enable Revenue Generation
Publication Date: 2023.11.09 LUCA VALENTIN
  • US20230360060A1 patent drawing
  • US20230360060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for quantifying the reduction of wildfire related emissions is designed to offer a basis for generating revenues by business willing to engage in fighting climate change by reducing the wildfire related emissions over a territory. The quantifying method is transparent and objective and is based on widely accepted data and forecasts, such that emissions reductions calculated with the disclosed method are certifiable to be traded on carbon markets. The quantifying method may be expeditiously applied to any territory.