Wind Turbine Blade Assembly System Using Tower-Mounted Capstans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assembling and disassembling windmill blades require large cranes, resulting in high costs, resource mobilization, and complexity, often impractical in locations without access to such equipment, and involve complicated and costly guiding systems.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a hoisting structure attachable to the windmill tower, a CBR structure with movable lifting points and clamps for blade orientation, and four traction cables with capstans for safe and efficient ascent and descent, allowing for compact transportation and reduced operational expenses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If large cranes are used for assembling and disassembling windmill blades, then the blades can be lifted and positioned, but the costs, resource mobilization, and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade assembly operationVSAvoidcrane system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the blade assembly system into modular components: a hoisting structure with multiple independent lifting points, a CBR structure with separate clamping and orientation mechanisms, and individual traction cable systems. This segmentation eliminates the need for a single large complex crane while achieving the same functional outcomes through coordinated simpler components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs movable lifting points on the CBR structure that can be dynamically repositioned along the blade, and a turning mechanism that dynamically adjusts blade orientation during the assembly process. This dynamic adaptability replaces the need for heavy fixed-position cranes with flexible, motion-based positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If traditional crane systems are deployed for blade installation, then lifting capacity is sufficient, but transportation and mobilization costs increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capacityVSAvoidcrane mobilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting function is segmented into four independent traction cable systems with capstans distributed around the tower, each handling a portion of the total load. This distributes the force requirement across multiple smaller, more transportable units rather than requiring one large crane with massive mobilization requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hoisting structure and CBR assembly are designed to be self-installing on the tower using the tower's own structural features as mounting points, eliminating the need for external crane assistance for installing the assembly equipment itself. The system installs itself, reducing mobilization time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If complicated guiding systems are incorporated in the tower for crane support, then the crane can be stabilized, but the system complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade lifting stabilityVSAvoidguiding system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention provides stability not through complex vertical guiding rails in the tower, but by distributing support forces across multiple dimensions: four capstans positioned around the tower circumference, multiple lifting points on the CBR structure, and a turning mechanism that distributes rotational forces. This multi-dimensional force distribution achieves stability without complex single-dimension guiding systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Power

If huge cranes are transported to the installation site, then adequate lifting power is available, but transportation requires up to 48 trucks and incurs huge costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting powerVSAvoidtransportation resources
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The total lifting power is segmented into four separate traction cable systems, each with its own capstan and motor. This allows the system to be transported in four separate units rather than one massive crane requiring 48 trucks, dramatically reducing transportation resource requirements while maintaining equivalent total lifting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the essential lifting function from the massive crane structure, isolating only the necessary components (hoisting structure, CBR, four traction cables, and capstans) that can be transported efficiently. This extraction eliminates the excessive structural mass of traditional cranes while preserving the core lifting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3299615B1System for the assembly/disassembly of blades in wind turbines
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 SLING SUPPLY INT SA
  • EP3299615B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3299615B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3299615B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

A system for assembling/disassembling a blade in the rotating hub of a windmill is described, which system includes a set of structural components including: a hoisting structure capable of joining the tower and providing an element to support the load, with a variable geometry to adapt to the changes of diameter of the tower; a main structure that moves along the extension of the tower, provided with lifting points, also movable to control the position in the horizontal level; a clamp structure to grasp the blade and facilitate the subsequent change in the orientation of the blade; and means for lifting the main structure made up by traction cables attached at one end to the hoisting structure and at the other end to respective capstans which are external to the structure and located at ground level.