Wind Turbine Blade Flow Guiding Device for Lift-Drag Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wind turbine blades face challenges in aerodynamic performance, particularly in the root and transition regions, leading to increased drag and reduced energy production, with existing solutions either increasing drag or not effectively enhancing lift-to-drag ratios.

Innovation Solution

A flow guiding device is integrated into the blade's pressure side, extending along the transition region, with a specific design that includes an inflow surface and end point configuration to generate airflow separation, increasing lift while managing drag, thereby improving the lift-to-drag ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the blade width in the transition region is increased to improve aerodynamic performance, then the lift is improved, but the drag increases due to larger surface area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guiding device is divided into multiple elements arranged along the transition region, with each element having a specific height and spacing. This segmentation allows the device to guide flow effectively while minimizing overall drag compared to a single large structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guiding device is specifically positioned in the transition region where flow separation naturally occurs, rather than uniformly across the entire blade. The device height and spacing are optimized for this specific region's aerodynamic characteristics, improving lift where needed while limiting drag increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If a flow guiding device is added to the blade to increase lift, then the aerodynamic performance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveliftVSAvoidblade structure
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guiding device elements are designed as thin, lightweight structures that can be integrated into the blade profile without adding significant mass or structural complexity. The elements follow the blade's contour and can be manufactured as thin-walled components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guiding device is applied only to the transition region of the blade where it is most needed, rather than the entire blade span. This partial application achieves the desired lift improvement while minimizing the added complexity and manufacturing effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Power

If the flow guiding device height is increased to improve lift generation, then the aerodynamic performance is improved, but the drag increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveliftVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device parameters (height, spacing, angle) are systematically optimized to achieve the desired lift-drag balance. By carefully selecting these parameters, the device generates sufficient lift while limiting drag increase to acceptable levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than using a single tall flow guiding element that would generate excessive drag, the invention uses multiple smaller elements distributed along the transition region. This partial action approach achieves cumulative lift improvement while each individual element creates minimal drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flow guiding device enhances the lift-to-drag ratio by up to 10% compared to conventional designs, leading to a 1-1.5% annual energy yield increase, providing substantial economic benefits over the blade's lifetime.

Implementation Method 1

the flow guiding device is arranged so as to generate a separation of airflow along at least a central longitudinal portion of the flow guiding device from the pressure side of the blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

the profiled contour when being impacted by an incident airflow generating a lift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift generation: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP2368034B1Wind turbine blade having a flow guiding device with optimised height
Publication Date: 2017.06.28 LM WIND POWER AS
  • EP2368034B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2368034B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2368034B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention discloses a wind turbine blade (10) with a flow guiding device (70) attached to a profiled contour (40, 42, 50) on a pressure side (52) of the blade. The flow guiding device extends along at least a longitudinal part of a transition region (32) of the blade and is arranged so as to generate a separation of airflow along at least a central longitudinal portion (71) of the flow guiding device from the pressure side of the blade at a point between the flow guiding device and a trailing edge (20) of the blade, when the blade is impacted by an incident airflow. The flow guiding device is arranged at a relative chordal position, seen from the leading edge of the blade, lying in an interval between 40% and 92%. The height of the flow guiding device to the profiled contour is at least 10% of a maximum thickness of the profiled contour for each transverse cross section.