Wind Turbine Component Replacement Schedule

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for predicting the remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of wind turbine components do not effectively schedule maintenance or replacement, leading to suboptimal operation and power output.

Innovation Solution

A method to estimate the remaining producible energy (RGP) of wind turbine components, using machine-learning techniques such as recurrent neural networks, to determine the optimal replacement schedule based on energy production rather than temporal lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional remaining useful lifetime (RUL) prediction methods are used, then a temporal scale for component degradation is provided, but this does not enable appropriate scheduling of maintenance or replacement and does not allow optimized control of the wind turbine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of replacement schedulingVSAvoidpower output optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter from temporal lifespan (RUL) to energy production capacity (RGP). Instead of predicting how many days or hours a component has left, the system estimates the actual energy production capacity remaining. This parameter transformation enables direct optimization of power output and maintenance scheduling based on actual functional capability rather than arbitrary time frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional time-based prediction mechanism with an energy-based estimation system. By substituting the temporal metric with an energy production metric, the system achieves more accurate and actionable predictions for maintenance scheduling and operational optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If fixed time frames are used for maintenance scheduling, then simplicity is maintained, but this leads to unnecessary downtime and suboptimal operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance scheduling simplicityVSAvoidunnecessary downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic maintenance scheduling based on actual component condition and remaining energy production capacity. Instead of fixed time frames, the system continuously updates maintenance recommendations based on real-time monitoring data, allowing flexible scheduling that adapts to actual component performance and minimizes unnecessary downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where monitoring data about component health and energy production capacity continuously informs maintenance scheduling decisions. This closed-loop approach allows the system to adjust maintenance timing based on actual component condition, reducing unnecessary downtime while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Duration of action of stationary object

If component replacement is scheduled based on temporal lifespan, then a simple timeline is provided, but this does not account for varying operational conditions and energy production capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent service lifeVSAvoidaccuracy of replacement timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the reliability assessment from time-based to energy-based parameters. By estimating remaining producible energy (RGP) instead of remaining useful lifetime, the system provides more accurate replacement timing that reflects actual component functional capability under varying operational conditions, thereby improving reliability assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12331720B2Wind turbine replacement schedule
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY AS
  • US12331720B2 patent drawing
  • US12331720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method and arrangement of estimating replacement schedule of a, in particular mechanical, component of a wind turbine, the method comprising: estimating remaining producible energy until this component is to be replaced.