Wind Turbine Control System Trajectory Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wind turbine safety systems react late to potential faults, leading to increased structural loads and costs due to limited computational capabilities and high costs of safety-certified equipment, as they rely on measuring only a subset of turbine states and react only when predefined limits are exceeded.

Innovation Solution

A control system that calculates predicted operational trajectories and validates them using a safety controller, allowing for proactive safe-mode operation by splitting the system into a main controller for complex calculations and a safety controller for validation, utilizing standard industrial computing and safety-certified equipment to ensure timely intervention before faults occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If existing safety systems use predefined limits based on a small subset of turbine states, then the system complexity and cost are reduced, but the detection timing is delayed and structural strength requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety system complexityVSAvoidfault detection timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system performs preliminary validation of predicted operational trajectories before faults occur. By validating predicted trajectories in advance using a safety controller, the system detects potential faults before they materialize into actual safety issues, enabling proactive rather than reactive safety management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A trajectory validator acts as an intermediary component between the main controller and the turbine operation. This intermediary validates predicted operational trajectories against safety constraints, providing a bridge between complex predictive algorithms and safety-critical decision-making without requiring full safety certification of the entire control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If predictive algorithms with high performing computing equipment are used, then fault detection capability is improved, but the cost of safety-certified equipment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidsafety-certified equipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two distinct parts: a main controller that handles complex predictive algorithms without safety certification, and a separate safety controller that performs validation with limited computational requirements. This segmentation allows high-performance computing for prediction while keeping safety-critical components simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety controller validates trajectories by checking against predefined safety constraints rather than running full predictive algorithms. This copying approach replicates the essential safety validation function using simplified logic and constraints, avoiding the need for expensive safety-certified high-performance computing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If the wind turbine operates at maximum power output, then productivity is improved, but the risk of exceeding operational limits increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety controller continuously validates predicted operational trajectories against safety constraints and provides feedback to the main controller. This feedback mechanism ensures that maximum power output operations are continuously monitored and adjusted to remain within safe operational limits, balancing productivity and safety dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

By validating predicted trajectories before execution, the system proactively identifies and prevents operations that would exceed safety limits. This preliminary safety check allows the turbine to operate at maximum power output when safe, while automatically preventing unsafe operations before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3180515B1Control of a wind turbine based on operational trajectory validation
Publication Date: 2019.12.04 VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS
  • EP3180515B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3180515B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3180515B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present invention relates tocontrol of wind turbines based on predicted operational trajectories. A control system for a wind turbineis described wherea main controller calculating one or more predicted operational trajectories and a safety controller validates at least one of the one or more predicted operational trajectories. The control system controls the wind turbine with the predicted control trajectory if the validation is valid, and controls the wind turbine with a safe-mode control trajectory if the validation is invalid. In an embodiment, the main controller is implemented as a receding horizon controller, e.g. in the form of a model predictive controller (MPC).