Winding Waveguide Optical Modulator Velocity Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrooptical modulators face limitations in compactness and integration due to the difference in velocities of propagation between light flux and electric signals, which restricts modulation length and rate, especially at high frequencies, and are often temperature sensitive and costly to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

The electrooptical component features a wave guide architecture with specific regions of interaction between the light flux and control electric elements, where the path length of the light flux is designed to differ from the path length of the control electric signal to compensate for their velocity differences, using a passive structure with a winding or curved layout to achieve this compensation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the modulation length is increased to improve modulation rate, then the velocity difference between light flux and electric signal becomes more significant, but compactness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation rateVSAvoidcompactness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The waveguide is configured in a planar winding or curved layout instead of a straight linear path. This transforms the one-dimensional propagation path into a two-dimensional spatial arrangement, allowing the light flux to travel a longer effective path length within a compact footprint area, thereby increasing modulation rate without proportionally increasing the device volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The waveguide employs curved or spiral geometries to increase the interaction length between light and modulating signal. The curved path allows the light flux to traverse a longer distance through the modulation region, enhancing the modulation effect and rate while maintaining a compact overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Reliability

If the path length difference between light flux and electric signal is increased to compensate for velocity differences, then modulation quality improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulation qualityVSAvoidwave guide architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The winding waveguide structure inherently provides the necessary path length compensation for velocity differences between light and electric signals. The geometry itself performs the synchronization function without requiring external active control circuits or additional compensation mechanisms, thereby improving modulation quality while avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a straight waveguide path is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the modulation rate is limited due to velocity differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave guide structureVSAvoidmodulation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By transitioning from a straight one-dimensional waveguide to a curved or spiral two-dimensional layout, the design achieves longer interaction length and better velocity compensation without adding complex three-dimensional structures or multiple components, thus maintaining simplicity while improving modulation rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the compactness, integration capacity, and manufacturing simplicity of electrooptical modulators while reducing temperature sensitivity and precision constraints, allowing for higher modulation rates and improved signal quality without the need for active control circuits.

Implementation Method 1

the length of the path travelled by the light flux has, with the length of the path travelled by the control electric signal, a difference determined to decrease or compensate for the difference in velocities of propagation of the light flux and the electric signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVelocity compensation through path length difference:

Implementation Method 2

The electrooptical modulator is a key element enabling information to be transferred from an electronic signal to an optical wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrooptical modulation: Electro-Optic Effects

Data Source

PatentUS8761549B2Semiconductor on insulant high-rate compact optical modulator having a winding waveguide structure
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 UNIV PARIS SACLAY
  • US8761549B2 patent drawing
  • US8761549B2 patent drawing
  • US8761549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component, device and improved electro-optical modulation system for increasing compactness, favoring the adaptation of optical and electrical waves, and a method of fabrication. Such a component exhibits a waveguide architecture devised so that the length of the path followed by the luminous flux exhibits, with the length of the path traversed by the electrical control signal, a determined difference for decreasing or compensating for the difference in the speeds of propagation of the luminous flux and of the electrical signal. In particular, the modulation zone includes a path of the luminous flux winding around itself and successively crossing at least two indentations emanating from at least two of these control elements. It thus exhibits a length greater than that traversed by the electrical signal, for example between a first and a second region of interaction between this control signal and this luminous flux.