Optical Window Contamination Sensing With Total Internal Reflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical sensors on aircraft windows are prone to contamination from dirt, aviation de-icing fluid, grease, oil, fuel, water droplets, and ice, which reduces their accuracy and reliability, and current systems lack automated methods to assess window cleanliness.

Innovation Solution

A contamination sensor using total internal reflectance (TIR) with collimated light sources and detectors, combined with prisms or polished edges, to measure the loss of light signal across the window surface, allowing for automated detection of contaminants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual inspections are used to check window cleanliness, then the system is simple, but the productivity is low and cannot provide real-time monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated optical sensing system. The contamination sensor uses light sources and detectors to automatically measure window cleanliness, eliminating the need for manual visual inspections and enabling continuous real-time monitoring without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The optical sensor system performs self-diagnosis by using its own emitted light to detect contaminants on its observation window. The sensor monitors its own operational status through the contamination detection mechanism, enabling autonomous functionality without requiring external inspection systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If existing contamination sensors are used, then some area is monitored, but the measurement precision is insufficient for the total window surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring coverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the window surface into multiple detection zones using an array of light sources and detectors positioned at different locations. Each light source-detector pair monitors a specific zone, and the combined data provides comprehensive coverage of the entire window surface with high measurement precision for each segment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from monitoring a small single area to covering the entire two-dimensional window surface by arranging multiple sensing elements in spatial arrays. The segmentation of the window into multiple detection zones along with the specific geometric arrangement of light sources and detectors enables comprehensive area coverage while maintaining measurement precision through the use of total internal reflectance at multiple measurement points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the optical sensor window becomes contaminated, then the sensor can still operate, but the reliability of readings decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading accuracyVSAvoidcontamination impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The contamination sensor provides continuous feedback about the window cleanliness status to the aircraft system. By measuring changes in light reflectance caused by contaminants, the system generates real-time data about window condition, enabling feedback-driven decisions about when cleaning or maintenance is required to maintain reading accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of contamination before it significantly degrades sensor performance. By continuously monitoring window cleanliness and detecting early signs of contamination through changes in optical properties, the system can trigger maintenance actions before reliability is compromised, preventing accuracy degradation rather than reacting to it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides real-time, automated detection of contaminants, maintaining sensor accuracy and reliability by assessing the emission-to-detection ratio and triggering alerts when contamination exceeds a threshold, ensuring continuous operation.

Implementation Method 1

A contamination sensor using total internal reflectance (TIR) with collimated light sources and detectors, combined with prisms or polished edges, to measure the loss of light signal across the window surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflectance: Total Internal Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4105686B1Window contamination sensor
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC
  • EP4105686B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4105686B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4105686B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A contamination sensor for an optical sensor observation window includes a source (18, 118, 218, 318, 418), two prisms, a detector (220, 320, 420), and a controller. The source (18, 118, 218, 318, 418) can emit a collimated light beam at an incident angle that is greater than a critical angle of an interface between a fluid and the window. The window has a refractive index greater than the refractive index of the fluid. The prisms can direct the collimated light beam within the window such that the collimated light beam reflects within a contamination detection zone of the window. The detector (220, 320, 420) can receive the collimated light beam. The controller can communicate with the source (18, 118, 218, 318, 418) and detector (220, 320, 420). The controller can calculate an emission/detection ratio defined by a difference between an amount of light emitted by the source (18, 118, 218, 318, 418) and an amount of light that passes from the source (18, 118, 218, 318, 418) to the detector (220, 320, 420) by a total internal reflectance of the window.