Window Covering Rotation Limiter With Spring Brake Assist

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional window blind systems face challenges in efficiently managing the force required to extend and retract window coverings, as the force needed increases as the covering is raised, and there is a lack of flexibility in mounting locations for drive mechanisms, limiting the range of functionality.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a spring motor and drag brake combination that provides assistance in raising and lowering window coverings by varying torque resistance based on direction and position, allowing for flexible mounting and reduced creep or falling of the shades, with the ability to pass lift and tilt shafts through the motor housing for compact installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a spring motor is used to assist in raising and lowering window coverings, then the force required to operate the covering is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce required to raise/lower coveringVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring motor and drag brake are combined into a single integrated housing, merging two separate mechanisms into one compact unit. This reduces the overall number of components while providing both the force assistance from the spring motor and the creep prevention from the drag brake, resolving the contradiction between reduced operating force and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated motor housing serves multiple functions: it houses the spring motor for force assistance, contains the drag brake for creep prevention, and provides mounting points for flexible installation. This multi-functionality allows a single component to address multiple operational requirements, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining force assistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the drive mechanism is mounted in a fixed location, then the mounting structure is simplified, but the range of functionality and flexible mounting options is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexible mounting optionsVSAvoidmounting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor housing is designed with universal mounting capabilities, featuring multiple mounting points and a compact form factor that allows installation in various locations (head rail, bottom rail, or side mounting). This versatility enables the same housing to adapt to different mounting scenarios without requiring additional complex mounting structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The drive system is segmented into a self-contained motor housing unit that can be independently mounted at different locations. This modular segmentation allows the housing to be positioned flexibly along the covering structure, providing adaptability to various installation requirements while keeping the mounting structure relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Volume of moving object

If lift and tilt shafts are routed through the motor housing, then the installation becomes more compact, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lift shaft and tilt shaft are routed through the motor housing, with the shafts passing through hollow passages within the housing structure. This nesting arrangement allows the shafts to be contained within the housing volume, reducing the overall installation space while integrating multiple functional elements into a compact configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The shaft routing utilizes the internal three-dimensional space of the motor housing by creating passageways through the housing structure. This dimensional approach allows the shafts to pass through the housing rather than around it, significantly reducing the external footprint of the installation while maintaining functional separation of components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides consistent and manageable force throughout the operation of window coverings, prevents unwanted movement, and allows for a wider range of functional configurations by enabling flexible mounting of drive components, enhancing user experience and system efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A spring motor and drag brake combination 102 can be used in window coverings to provide assistance in raising and lowering the window coverings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

A spring motor and drag brake combination 102 can be used in window coverings to provide assistance in raising and lowering the window coverings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8752607B2Covering for architectural openings including a rotation limiter
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 HUNTER DOUGLAS INC
  • US8752607B2 patent drawing
  • US8752607B2 patent drawing
  • US8752607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A covering for architectural openings.