Window Sash Drift Inhibition via Cam Brake Interlock

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing counterbalance systems for tilt-in double-hung windows, particularly those with vinyl frames, face issues with window sashes drifting closed due to reduced friction over time, as they rely on coil springs that often provide insufficient counterbalance force, leading to unintentional movement under gravity or contact with other sashes.

Innovation Solution

A system featuring brake shoe assemblies with a cam mechanism and catch stops in the guide tracks that interconnect when the window sash is fully open, providing a mechanical or magnetic interlock to prevent drifting, which can be overridden by a manual downward force, ensuring the window sash remains in place without relying solely on friction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coil springs are used to counterbalance the window sash weight, then the window can be held in various positions, but the counterbalance force is insufficient and the window sash drifts closed due to reduced friction over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewindow position stabilityVSAvoidcounterbalance force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The brake shoe assembly is divided into separate functional components: a cam mechanism for generating locking force, a brake shoe for friction engagement, and a catch stop for positioning. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, with the cam providing mechanical advantage to generate sufficient holding force without requiring excessive spring force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a cam mechanism activated by the window sash weight itself to generate a locking force that counteracts gravity. As the window sash descends, its weight activates the cam, which rotates to engage the brake shoe against the guide track, creating a self-activating counterbalance system that provides reliable holding force without requiring oversized springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Device complexity

If friction is relied upon to retain the window in an open position, then the system remains simple, but friction reduces over time causing the window to drift closed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterbalance system structureVSAvoidwindow position retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The brake shoe acts as an intermediary between the cam mechanism and the guide track. It transfers the mechanical force generated by the cam into a friction-based holding force against the guide track surface, providing a reliable interface that maintains window position without requiring direct cam-to-track engagement or complex locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively counteracts the anticipated loss of friction over time by using the cam mechanism to generate active mechanical holding force. Rather than relying on initial high friction that degrades, the system continuously applies counterbalancing force through the cam-brake shoe assembly, preventing drift before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Force

If multiple small coil springs are ganged together to provide counterbalance force for heavier sashes, then sufficient force is achieved, but space restrictions prevent using larger springs and the system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterbalance forceVSAvoidspring assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using multiple springs in parallel, the system uses a single cam mechanism that replicates the force-multiplication effect of multiple springs. The cam's mechanical advantage ratio effectively amplifies the force from a single spring or even the window sash weight itself, eliminating the need for multiple springs while maintaining the required counterbalance force for heavy sashes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameter from spring force multiplication (using multiple springs) to mechanical advantage multiplication (using the cam mechanism). This parameter change allows the system to achieve the same or greater counterbalance force with fewer components, reducing complexity and freeing up space within the window assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the brake shoe and stop interconnect to prevent drifting, then the window remains securely open, but the system requires a manual override force to close the window

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewindow position stabilityVSAvoidwindow closing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The brake shoe assembly is designed with dynamic characteristics that allow it to engage firmly for holding the window open while permitting easy release when needed. The cam mechanism can be easily overridden by applying downward force to the window sash, which rotates the cam disengaged from the brake shoe. Once disengaged, the window closes freely under gravity without requiring excessive force, providing both secure holding and easy operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents window sashes from drifting closed due to gravity or contact, maintaining the open position until manually closed, thereby addressing the issue of insufficient counterbalance force and varying friction levels.

Implementation Method 1

A cam mechanism and catch stops in the guide tracks that interconnect when the window sash is fully open

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

The shoes contain a brake mechanism that is activated by the tilt post of the window sash when the window sash is tilted inwardly away from the window frame. The shoe therefore locks the tilt post in place

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The coil springs supply the counterbalance force needed to suspend the weight of the window sash

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 4

prevent the window sashes from constantly moving to the bottom of the window frame under the force of their own weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9995071B2System and method for inhibiting window sash drift
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 JOHN EVANS SONS INC
  • US9995071B2 patent drawing
  • US9995071B2 patent drawing
  • US9995071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for inhibiting inadvertent movement of a window sash out of a fully open position. Brake shoes travel in the guide tracks as the window sash is moved between a fully open position and a fully closed position. A stop is mounted within the guide tracks. The brake shoe and the stop contact and interconnect when the window sash is moved to its fully open position. The brake shoe is separable from the stop when a closing force is manually applied to the window sash that acts to move the window sash away from its fully open position. The force applied must exceed a threshold level. In this manner, the window sash will remain in its fully open position and will not inadvertently drift closed due to gravity, vibrations or contact with another window sash.