Window Security Device Detects Fitting Position

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security devices for windows and doors lack reliability and convenience in detecting unauthorized openings, as they require manual activation and deactivation, leading to potential false alarms and reliance on user attention.

Innovation Solution

A security device that detects the state and position of a fitting arrangement, allowing for automatic activation or deactivation based on the fitting's position, eliminating the need for manual intervention and enhancing the detection of permissible or impermissible openings by considering the fitting's position in conjunction with the window's state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual activation and deactivation of the alarm device is implemented, then the alarm can be controlled to trigger only when needed, but the reliability decreases due to potential user oversight and false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control of alarmVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines whether an opening is permissible or impermissible by detecting the state of the fitting arrangement, eliminating the need for manual activation or deactivation of the alarm device. The security device monitors the fitting's position and automatically triggers the alarm only when an impermissible opening is detected, making the system self-regulating and removing human error from the equation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of the fitting arrangement's state before determining whether to trigger an alarm. By continuously monitoring the fitting's position and comparing it against predefined criteria for permissible openings, the system prepares in advance to trigger the alarm only when necessary, avoiding both false alarms and missed detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the alarm device is continuously active, then unauthorized openings are reliably detected, but false alarms increase due to permissible openings being treated as unauthorized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized opening detectionVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different evaluation criteria based on the local state of the fitting arrangement. By detecting specific positions of the fitting (such as locked versus unlocked states), the system determines whether an opening should trigger an alarm. This localized quality assessment allows the system to distinguish between permissible openings (when the fitting is in an unlocked position) and impermissible openings (when the fitting is locked), eliminating false alarms while maintaining reliable detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being monitored from a simple binary open/closed state to a multi-state detection based on the fitting arrangement's position. By detecting parameters such as the fitting's locked/unlocked status and comparing it against the sash's opening state, the system dynamically adjusts its alarm trigger criteria, allowing permissible openings to occur without triggering false alarms while maintaining security against unauthorized openings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the security device monitors only the wing's open/closed state, then the system remains simple, but it cannot distinguish between permissible and impermissible openings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring systemVSAvoidopening state detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The security device leverages the existing multi-functional fitting arrangement, which serves both as a locking mechanism and as a detection element. By monitoring the fitting's position (which controls whether the sash can be opened), the system gains additional information without adding separate monitoring systems. The fitting arrangement's inherent positions (locked, unlocked, partially locked) provide the necessary data to distinguish between permissible and impermissible openings, achieving high measurement precision while maintaining relatively simple device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3535739B2Security device for monitoring the position of a wing
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 MACO TECHNOLOGIE GMBH
  • EP3535739B2 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3535739B2 patent drawingFigure 3~6

AI summary

A securing device for securing the wing of a window, door or the like against impermissible opening is designed to detect a state of the wing, which can be in a closed state or in an open state, and to detect a position of a fitting assembly of the wing, which can be moved between an unlocking position and one or more locking positions, wherein the wing can be opened completely, in particular opened by rotation when the fitting assembly is in the unlocking position, and the wing can be opened only to a limited extent, in particular opened by tilting, or is prevented from opening when the fitting assembly is in one of the locking positions. The securing device is also designed to output a state signal, in particular to an alarm device, according to both the detected state of the wing and the detected position of the fitting assembly.