Windrower Predictive Weed Mapping for Sensor-Limited Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile agricultural windrowing machines struggle to effectively detect weeds due to sensor limitations such as latency, visibility issues from dust/debris, and low light conditions, which affects the ability to adjust operations in real-time.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates predictive weed maps using in-situ sensors and historical or prior data to provide proactive control of windrowing machines by integrating predictive models with information maps like historical performance, vegetative index, crop genotype, soil type, soil moisture, soil nutrient, and optical maps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If in-situ sensors are used to detect weeds in real-time, then weed detection capability is improved, but sensor reliability deteriorates due to latency, dust/debris visibility issues, and low light conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating predictive weed maps before the windrowing operation using historical data and environmental factors. This allows the control system to proactively adjust machine operations in advance rather than reacting to real-time sensor data that may be unreliable due to dust, debris, and lighting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary predictive modeling system that bridges the gap between unreliable real-time sensor data and operational control decisions. The predictive weed maps serve as an intermediary representation of weed locations, derived from multiple data sources including historical performance data, vegetative index maps, and environmental conditions, rather than relying solely on direct sensor detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If real-time sensor detection is used for weed identification, then operational responsiveness is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational responsivenessVSAvoidweed detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates predictive weed maps in advance of the windrowing operation, allowing operational adjustments to be made proactively rather than reactively. This preliminary action ensures both responsiveness (by having predictions ready) and precision (by using multiple data sources rather than relying on compromised real-time sensor data).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple data sources including historical performance data, vegetative index maps, soil type maps, and environmental conditions to create a comprehensive predictive weed map. This combination compensates for the weaknesses of any single detection method and provides more reliable and precise weed location information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If proactive weed detection using predictive models is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed to be multi-functional, handling not only predictive weed map generation but also historical data management, real-time sensor data processing, machine operation control, and predictive modeling. By consolidating these functions into a single universal control system, the patent manages complexity while achieving proactive operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating predictive weed maps and using them to control windrowing operations without requiring constant human intervention. The control system autonomously processes data, generates predictions, and adjusts machine operations, reducing the need for manual monitoring and decision-making while improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12364179B2Map based farming for windrower operation
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 DEERE & CO
  • US12364179B2 patent drawing
  • US12364179B2 patent drawing
  • US12364179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural system. The one or more information maps map one or more characteristic values at different geographic locations in a worksite. An in-situ sensor detects a weed value as a mobile machine operates at the worksite. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that maps predictive weed values at different geographic locations in the worksite based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the weed value detected by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.